AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Susan Miller

PSYCH125 · PSYCH205 · SOCIOLOGY205 · PSYC205 · SOC100 · SOC205 · SOC110 · PYCH205 · 142 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.64%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you need a patient teacher who will get you through; and stay on top of Canvas.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring Stats SaviorExtra Credit HeavyCheat Sheet ExamsGroup Project RiskClear Lectures
  • Makes statistics approachable for math-anxious students with and heavy support.
  • , and cheat sheets boost grades, but .
  • Online sections are mostly Canvas modules with occasional proctored exams and uneven organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most students report easy As with and retakeable work, though tough group-project grading blocks some perfect scores.

Online and in-person both report and ; online adds more complaints about harsh project scores.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Stats content can intimidate, but and resources make the material feel beginner-friendly for most.

Both formats agree she simplifies stats; online 8-week sections feel faster-paced.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others mark it yes, so policy depends on the section.

Online often has no live meetings; in-person mixes optional and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Strong majority would take her again for making hard stats doable, with a minority warning about organization or projects.

Recommendation is high in both formats, with more organizational gripes online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Homework and quizzes are forgiving with retries and , but .

Format shift

Online reviews ; in-person leans more generous overall.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, and two group projects keep work steady but usually manageable.

Format shift

Online 8-week sections feel heavier; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students , and skilled at teaching stats to non-math people.

Format shift

Praise is strong in both formats; a few online reviews cite confusion or late posts.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix retakeable quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats use quizzes, exams, and projects; online sometimes stresses proctored tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews highlight caring lectures, in-class homework help, cheat sheets, and that make stats passable.

Main concern

You still need to study; a few students call projects or .

What students said

“ and she allows study groups which helped A LOT!”
PSYCH205
“a cheat sheet was allowed for exams.”
SOC205
“She is so funny and made statistics fun and interesting. Cheat sheets on the exams and lots of offered.”
PSYC205

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and no-textbook options, but flag late module posts, group projects, and occasional proctored exams.

Main concern

Group projects and occasional disorganization or manageable.

What students said

“Took statistics as an 8 week online class and she made it so easy!”
PSYC205
“Mid-term and !”
PSYC205
“the . Just don't.”
PSYC205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, though some online sections report proctoring.

Cheat SheetOpen NotesExtra CreditOccasional Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes and feel fair when students study.

Cheat SheetOpen NotesStudy Groups
“a cheat sheet was allowed for exams.”
SOC205
“ and she allows study groups which helped A LOT!”
PYCH205
“Online test and in ”
PSYC205

Online

notes, but a minority report proctored testing.

Cheat SheetOpen NotesProctored Exams
“Mid-term and !”
PSYC205
“The exams and and group projects (2) were all doable.”
PSYC205
“And the . Just don't.”
PSYC205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr Miller LOVES her job and is very good at it! She made ME excited about Stats.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and support themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

86/100

“Dr. Miller has a unique ability to translate .”

⭐ Recommendation Strength

84/100

“ !!”

📝 Grade Support

78/100

“She dedicates a lot of time outside of class to helping students”

⚠️ Project Risk

40/100

“even if you hit all the criteria it is almost impossible to get an A on the projects.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and repeats herself in order to ensure that her students understand!
  • Her lectures are so engaging & insightful.
  • she made sure I got it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Keep up with deadlines and follow instructions and you should get a pretty easy A.
  • Offers multiple opportunities.
  • This class is fairly easy, but Professor Miller is a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very kind and patient with her students.
  • she truly is the best and actually cares about her students.
  • Seriously wants you to succeed if you're willing to work for it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

142

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning years across online and and grades.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 593
4 out of 529
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYC20524 reviews
SOC2058 reviews
PSYCH2056 reviews
SOC1004 reviews
PYCH2053 reviews
Show 3 more courses
SOC1103 reviews
PSYCH1251 review
SOCIOLOGY2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 7 · A 22 · A- 2

B range

14

B+ 4 · B 8 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1