AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Snow

MATHMATH · MATH54 · CO71734 · M56 · MAT50 · MATH56 · MATH60 · MATH50 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
73.68%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you already handle algebra well or thrive under strict, test-focused teaching; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHer way onlyCheap self-made bookTest-driven gradesImpatient with questionsHomework as extra credit
  • Students either call her life-changing for developmental math or rude, impatient, and hostile to questions.
  • ; homework often counts only as .
  • She uses her own inexpensive workbook packet and expects her exact methods.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but and her-method-only rules block free As.

In-person evidence is mixed; the one online review reports a D and rigid methods.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Developmental algebra content is standard, but fast pace and mental-math style raise the felt difficulty.

In-person dominates; online reviewer found the approach especially hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as ; many others mark it mandatory and penalize lateness.

Nearly all notes are in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Loyal fans credit first math As to her, while a large .

In-person is deeply split; the lone online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but tough-grader and her-way-only comments keep standards strict.

Format shift

In-person mixed; online called her a .

Workload

Light

62/100

and EC-only, with the real load concentrated in preparing for few high-stakes tests.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person; .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Half the ; the other half describes frustration, put-downs, and impatience.

Format shift

In-person polarization drives the average; online review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple reviews state tests alone determine the grade with homework as .

Format shift

Strong in-person consensus; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person algebra classes use her cheap packet book, lecture practice, and as EC; praise and anger both run hot.

Main concern

Rude or intimidating responses to questions scare struggling students.

What students said

“Tests are the . Tests based completely off homework.”
MATH50
“She's extremely rude and only wants you to do math her way”
MAT50
“She is the class full of different types of learners.”
MATH54

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

method must match her videos exactly and .

Main concern

Rigid my-way-or-highway approach online with a poor grade outcome.

What students said

“She only wants you to do math her way, or the highway.”
MATH54

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course grade is driven by unit tests and a and her packet methods.

Test heavyHomework as ECHer method onlyWorkbook packet

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and her packet, with no clear proctoring software mentioned.

Tests only for gradeHomework extra creditPacket workbook
“Tests are the .”
MATH50
“ .”
MATH50

Online

Online review stresses rigid video methods and .

Her way onlyTough grader
“she wants you to do it the way her videos do it.”
MATH54

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The perfect professor. Answers ALL questions about homework & practice problems. Tests are the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (49 in-person, 1 online), capturing strong praise and strong hostility. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She is the class full of different types of learners.”

⚠️ Attitude Risk

30/100

“She's extremely rude and only wants you to do math her way & makes her own ridiculous book.”

📝 Assessment Style

88/100

“Tests are the . Tests based completely off homework.”

👍 Fan Recommendation

80/100

“The . I have never had an A in math until her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She only wants you to do math her way, or the highway
  • She made her own book witch was very useful
  • she gets really rude & angry when you ask questions for help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't get an A, it's not her, it's you
  • bring your A game. She is tough
  • and

Theme 3

💵 About Materials

  • She created her own textbook, it's all worksheets and it's very cheap
  • the textbook is her handmade version
  • No book, just blue binder pages that go along with her lecture

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and stable themes of method rigidity and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 514
3 out of 58
2 out of 517
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH5019 reviews
MATH569 reviews
MATH546 reviews
M564 reviews
MAT504 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH604 reviews
561 review
718121 review
CO717341 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1