AI Rate Professor

Health

Solange Wasef

NUTR165 · HE165 · NUT185 · BIOFCS185 · FCS165 · FCS185 · BIO185 · NUTR100 · BIOL185 · HEALTH165 · NUTR185 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
51.52%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to learn nutrition deeply and can handle .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy homeworkPassionate nutrition proExtra credit abundantTedious structureStrict professionalism
  • many praise real-world nutrition expertise and , others call the class over-assigned and tedious.
  • Recent online sections add AI-ethics work that some feel distracts from nutrition.
  • An A is possible with diligence and , but not a low-effort win.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

and clear criteria help, but and heavy work mean an A still takes real weekly effort.

Older online reviews more often say Easy A; recent online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Nutrition content itself is approachable, but , and AI modules raise the felt difficulty.

Online difficulty is driven by structure and AI tasks; in person by volume and strict expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

40/100

Many sections require live participation or cameras; missing class is repeatedly linked to risk of failing.

Online async options exist but participation is still emphasized; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; the other half warn peers to pick someone with less busywork.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and and nitpicky professional-response standards offset that.

Format shift

Online recent reviews lean tougher; .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Students consistently report , and time-consuming directions.

Format shift

Both formats flag heavy load; online AI debates and long videos intensify the complaint.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Strong subject passion and real-field knowledge, but structure, tone, and .

Format shift

In-person historical praise is warmer; recent online quality scores are more mixed to negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade , and unit work more than a single final.

Format shift

Online is assignment- and discussion-heavy; in person adds lecture fill-ins and exams with cheat sheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person she is often described as passionate and fair with cheat sheets and , but and strict on policies.

Main concern

Lots of weekly assignments and .

What students said

“She also lets you use cheat sheets for exams. ”
HEALTH165
“Be ready to turn in a lot of assignments, and complete the .”
NUTR185
“her class was very difficult with loads of .”
HEALTH165

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

long fill-in lectures, meticulous assignment instructions, heavy weekly work, and recent AI-literacy debates alongside nutrition content.

Main concern

, and AI-ethics tasks that feel off-topic to many.

What students said

“This class is half learning about nutrition, and the .”
BIO185
“ if you value your time.”
NUTR165
“Easy A! ... The lectures can be long if you're taking them online.”
NUTR165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several reviews note cheat sheets or open-style help on exams, so grind.

Cheat sheets allowedFill-in lecture notesExtra creditOpen materials in some terms

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reward lecture attendance and notes.

Full page of notes on testsCheat sheets for examsQuizzes can be tricky
“Let's us use a full page of ”
HEALTH165
“She also lets you use cheat sheets for exams. ”
HEALTH165

Online

Some online terms report no timed tests and open materials; .

No timed quizzes in some termsOpen everythingFill-in-the-blank lectures help exams
“ .”
NUT185
“the lectures are fill-in-the-blank which helps with the .”
NUTR165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor but hard class! This is a very loaded class... If your goal is to take this class to be an easy pass then look elsewhere.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 health and nutrition reviews, balancing passion praise against heavy-structure complaints. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

26/100

“ if you value your time.”

🎯 Subject Passion

72/100

“She is full of knowledge and shows it in a .”

🅰️ Grade Reality

54/100

“you will have to work for an A but its nothing extremely difficult. Tons of opportunities.”

🤖 Recent AI Focus

35/100

“This class is half learning about nutrition, and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she makes sure you learn the material
  • She relates to you as a peer
  • Truly loves the subject and cares about her students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of , don't stress about grade
  • she grades so bad she wants us to answer as professional college student

Theme 3

⏱️ About Workload and Structure

  • and detailed
  • Ridiculous lecture lengths
  • Too many unnecessary steps and directions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine reviews across online and in-person nutrition and health courses show a stable split on workload versus passion, supporting high credibility.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 55
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUTR16514 reviews
HE1657 reviews
BIO1856 reviews
HEALTH1656 reviews
FCS1655 reviews
Show 6 more courses
NUTR1854 reviews
BIOL1852 reviews
NUT1852 reviews
BIOFCS1851 review
FCS1851 review
NUTR1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 5