AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Frazee

MATH115 · MATH120 · MATH130 · MATH60 · MATH15 · MATH135 · MATH110 · MATH50 · MATH10 · MATH140 · MATH126 · MATH100 · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76.74%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will use office hours and study guides; she rewards effort but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPartial Credit QueenCaring Math MentorTest HeavyClear LecturesWebAssign Required
  • and offers generous partial credit.
  • ; but often paid online.
  • In-person praise is strong; some older online formats felt peer-teach heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Partial credit and EC help, but A.

In-person stress partial credit and study guides; some online students felt tests mismatched prep.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

College math stays challenging, though her lectures and reviews make it more manageable.

Difficulty is similar across formats; online complaints focus more on delivery style than pure content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

but notes, EC, and .

Many in-person sections post notes online; online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students call her a top math professor, with a .

In-person recommendation is stronger; online has more avoid votes from 2020-2021 formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Generous partial credit, name-on-quiz points, and frequent .

Format shift

In-person leniency is widely praised; a few online students call her a .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Nightly or ; not endless busywork, but consistent.

Format shift

; cost complaints appear mainly in person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and strong office-hour support dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

In-person teaching scores higher; some pandemic online sections were peer-led and poorly received.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Multiple tests and a final usually dominate, sometimes near 95% of the course grade.

Format shift

Exam weight is clearest in in-person MATH140/120; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students largely love her clear examples, office hours, partial credit, and , despite hard math tests.

Main concern

Tests are often 95% of the grade and WebAssign or textbook access costs money.

What students said

“Exams are 95% of your grade but she gives lots of partial credit.”
MATH140
“If you need to take math and .”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and organized, while others say group teaching replaced lectures.

Main concern

A few online sections felt under-taught with peer groups and mismatched study guides.

What students said

“Prof. Frazee was excellent at helping her students be successful, while and caring”
MATH120
“She AT ALL and she puts you in groups and your supposed to teach each other”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but and study guides with partial credit.

Test HeavyPartial CreditStudy Guides Similar to ExamsDaily Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but mirror reviews and class examples, with lots of partial credit and sometimes daily quizzes.

Test HeavyPartial CreditStudy GuidesExtra Credit
“ and similar to the . Offers lots of partial credit on the exams.”
MATH140
“credits for writing equations even if ”
MATH120

Online

; complaints focus on peer teaching and test mismatch.

Test HeavyStudy GuidesGroup Learning Format
“the .”
MATH126
“the .”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I averaged around a C in every math class in my life until i took her class and I got an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across many math courses, . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ .”

📝

55/100

“Exams are 95% of your grade but she gives lots of partial credit.”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“ , and .”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“If you need to take math and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture style is very straightforward
  • She takes the as long as you ask.
  • works through examples with you all class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Offers lots of partial credit on the exams.
  • your grade depended almost entirely on the 4 tests and

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • She AT ALL and she puts you in groups
  • You heavily rely on learning from classmates instead of learning from the professor.
  • If you make an and follow along during lectures, you will be successful!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with rich detail, grade data, and mostly consistent themes despite some online outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 585
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH11011 reviews
MATH12010 reviews
MATH1408 reviews
MATH1307 reviews
MATH1264 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1352 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH101 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1351 review
MATH151 review
MATH501 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1