AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Wolfe

EC402 · ENG202 · ENGL124 · ENG100 · ENG50 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
94.29%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will keep up with the writing load; she makes English fun and rewards consistent effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and caringLots of writingExtra credit queenClear feedbackNo textbook needed
  • Students overwhelmingly call her funny, caring, and one of the .
  • Workload is heavy with frequent small tasks and essays, but and failure is rare if you work.
  • Many and open-note assessments instead.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

, and many As make high grades very reachable if you complete the work.

Online and ; online notes harder big-assignment grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Concepts and prompts are beginner-friendly, though reading and writing volume add challenge.

Both formats describe approachable content with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as mandatory or important, but and online options often need less seat time.

In-person leans mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

About 94% would take her again and comments repeatedly call her the .

Strong praise appears in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and no late penalties for many students outweigh occasional tough big-paper scores.

Format shift

Online has a few tougher-grading complaints; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and multiple essays keep the load high.

Format shift

Both formats stress weekly writing volume, especially online.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students , and genuine investment in success.

Format shift

Praise is consistent across online and in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade is , and a research paper more than traditional exams.

Format shift

; online is assignment-heavy with occasional harder big papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students rave , and ability to make writing fun, with but high A potential for those who show up and work.

Main concern

Lots of short essays and if you procrastinate.

What students said

“ . No late penalties.”
ENG100
“it is almost impossible to fail.”
ENG100
“Easy A, just do the work!”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and , while noting weekly assignment volume and occasional slow or strict grading on big papers.

Main concern

Weekly task volume and .

What students said

“even though there was a lot of so flexible and very helpful!”
ENGL124
“There is a lot of tasks todo every week, so plan ahead.”
ENG202
“You really have to try to not get a good grade in her class.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and use open-note quizzes or a .

No tests/quizzes commonOpen-note tests when usedResearch paper finalEssay resubmissions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-note tests when given, and a research paper as the final.

No tests/quizzesOpen note testsResearch paper final
“ . No late penalties.”
ENG100
“Two tests, both open note. . ”
ENG202

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and papers rather than proctored exams; proctoring is not clearly described.

Assignment heavyEssay resubmissionsExtra credit
“ !”
ENG202
“If you do the work and follow the prompts, Kim makes this class easy to pass!”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the best professor at Palomar College, hands down.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (9 online, 41 in-person), highlighting humor, heavy writing, and high success rates. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She's so funny and overall great energy to be around.”

📝 Workload Reality

28/100

“There is a lot of tasks todo every week, so plan ahead.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“Take her class if you get the chance because it is almost impossible to fail.”

⭐ Easy A Path

80/100

“Easy A, just do the work!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's so funny and overall great energy to be around.
  • She genuinely wants to help and better her students
  • and never judges difference of opinions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, just do the work!
  • it is almost impossible to fail.
  • If you are looking for an easy A, this is not your teacher.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of and
  • Almost every class something is due
  • as it is assigned

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show highly consistent themes of care, humor, and heavy writing.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 577
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG10040 reviews
ENG2025 reviews
ENGL1242 reviews
1001 review
EC4021 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 5 · A 20

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5