AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Rachel Rothman

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Worth taking for solid nutrition content if and communicate clearly, but expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed lecturesCaring but unevenWeekly assignmentsExtra credit availableMixed grading fairness
  • and real learning from projects and readings.
  • One online student , and dropped the class.
  • Workload is manageable with short weekly tasks and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is reachable with steady weekly work and , but and confusing.

Online evidence is mixed on fairness; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

, though reading and participation still matter.

Both formats describe learnable material; and project load.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while at least one online review says attendance was required.

; online reports disagree.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Three of four reviews strongly recommend her for knowledge and care, offset .

Positive tone appears in both formats; the sharpest criticism is online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and clear feedback help many students, but tough-grader complaints and .

Format shift

Online alone contains the tough-grader and drop report.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Short weekly assignments, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Workload detail comes mainly from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students repeatedly call lectures detailed and responses.

Format shift

In-person and most online reviews are glowing; one online review is hostile.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grade , and major projects more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Assessment details are drawn almost entirely from online comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single in-person and strong learning value.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Professor Rothman is super knowledgeable and cares a lot about what she teaches.”
165

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly praise detailed lectures and manageable weekly work, though and .

Main concern

and at least one report of .

What students said

“This class had short weekly assignments due on Saturdays at 11:59pm, most of which can be completed by using a free textbook.”
165
“She also graded unfairly. My grade dropped 2 grade letters after the .”
165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and proctoring policy stated.

Project basedDiscussion boardsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book learning without describing exam format.

ProjectsTextbook based learning
“You will learn from her, the projects and the book she uses.”
165

Online

Online , and two advance-notice major projects.

Weekly assignmentsDiscussion postsMajor projects
“Major Projects (only two) were opened 2-3 weeks in advance (only took 3-4 hours max to finish)”
165
“Get ready to participate in discussion posts and .”
165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Rothman is super knowledgeable and cares a lot about what she teaches. You will learn from her, the projects and the book she uses.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in person), balancing strong praise with . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Lecture Depth

76/100

“Her lectures are really detailed, so you will get a lot out of them.”

⚖️

52/100

“She also graded unfairly. My grade dropped 2 grade letters after the .”

📝 Workload Reality

62/100

“This class had short weekly assignments due on Saturdays at 11:59pm, most of which can be completed by using a free textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super knowledgeable and cares a lot about what she teaches
  • Her lectures are really detailed
  • always responded

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Theme 3

📋 About Course Structure

  • participate in discussion posts

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent reviews with mixed grades and one sharp negative outlier limit confidence despite detailed comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1654 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2