AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Cynthia Wong

FIRE101 · FIRE118 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; if and tolerate confusion and strict attendance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough GraderUnclear CriteriaMandatory AttendanceAvoid
  • Overwhelming pattern of disorganization, lost work, and .
  • Material is often described as not hard, but delivery, structure, and tone make the class painful.
  • Only isolated recent praise; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Students report A and B grades, but tough subjective grading and than easy.

Online and marks.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is repeatedly called not hard; , and tone.

Similar content-is-not-hard message online and in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory, including camera requirements online.

; online adds camera pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Would-take-again sits near 20 percent with many blunt do-not-take-again comments.

Online reviews are uniformly negative; warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students cite subjective criteria and confusion over standards.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and pop-quiz risk add steady outside load.

Format shift

Homework and group-project load show up online and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most describe poor organization, off-topic lectures, weak LMS use, and rude or harsh tone.

Format shift

Online is almost entirely negative; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and group projects rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Pop quizzes and tests called out in person; and work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly harsh reviews on poor , and demotivating tone, with one recent strong positive outlier.

Main concern

, and lectures that miss tested material.

What students said

“literally the !”
FIRE118
“her lectures and the quizes and test.”
FIRE118
“I really enjoyed her class. There was something about going to her class that I just enjoyed.”
FIRE118

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online FIRE118 reviews slam unclear syllabus and , and mandatory cameras.

Main concern

and poor communication.

What students said

“ and . Lots of confusion with students and quick to snap at them”
FIRE118
“ .”
FIRE118
“ and cameras another big L.”
FIRE118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments look like standard quizzes and tests; reviews do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser, but online cameras and .

Quizzes and testsPop quizzesMandatory cameras online

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests that may not match lectures or reading, plus pop-quiz warnings.

Pop quizzesTests not aligned to lecturesHomework-linked
“her lectures and the quizes and test.”
FIRE118

Online

Online students report tests and quizzes that are often revised for instructor errors, plus mandatory cameras; .

Mandatory camerasQuizzes revised for wrong answersUnclear grading
“Most test and her tests.”
FIRE118
“ and cameras another big L.”
FIRE118

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“literally the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting disorganization, grading friction, and rare positives. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌪️ Organization

20/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“ and .”

🚫 Recommendation

20/100

“10/10 would not take again.”

📚 Content Difficulty

52/100

“Material is not hard at all she just makes the course so hard to enjoy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Powerpoint lectures all over the place
  • likes to talk about herself too much and strays away from lectures
  • Class Lecture is uninteresting and delivered poorly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ Red Flags

  • quick to snap at them if they did anything to upset her
  • This class will discourage you from perusing a career in the field.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews from 2017-2024 with strong consistency on disorganization and toughness; small sample and one recent positive slightly reduce certainty.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

FIRE1189 reviews
FIRE1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values