AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kamal Sadatmand

MATH15 · MATH60 · MATH50 · MATH90 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you already know the math and only need a seat; most students report stress and little learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandTeach Yourself MathHomework DumpUnresponsive EmailsAvoid If Possible
  • Most recent reviews slam , and slow communication.
  • Students say because board examples are few and sometimes wrong.
  • A minority of older reviews call the class an easy pass, but overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students report and few tests, but others struggle because teaching fails and stress is high.

Evidence is mostly in-person; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material itself is lower-division math, but .

In-person comments dominate; online offers no content detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and warn that skipping hurts.

; online sample is too small to generalize.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Quality average is 2.1 and most detailed reviews beg others not to enroll.

Both ; in-person majority matches that warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

A few students pass easily with few exams, but and late grade posts create anxiety.

Format shift

In-person opinions split between easy pass and ; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report 50-plus homework problems per class that are signed but rarely collected or reviewed.

Format shift

; online tags also list lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Accent, rushed examples, wrong board work, and weak answers leave students teaching themselves.

Format shift

In-person and online both rate teaching quality near the bottom.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

while and inconsistently explained.

Format shift

; some older reviews mention few tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe rushed board work, , and rare kind-but-weak instruction.

Main concern

Homework is piled on without review and .

What students said

“ !!!!!! He is the and that says a lot.”
MATH15
“All he does is a couple of problems on the board for your 2 hr long class and gives you at least 50+ problems for ”
MATH15
“Be ready to teach yourself professor does bad job”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online MATH90 reviews are pure avoid warnings with no constructive detail.

Main concern

Students call him the delivery worked.

What students said

“This is the ! ”
MATH90
“THIS IS THE !!!!! !”
MATH90

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some sections use few tests with study guides while others feel opaque.

Few exams in some sectionsStudy guides sometimes reviewedMultiple choice mentioned historicallyHomework-heavy prep

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and use multiple-choice tests; others give little exam clarity.

Study guide reviewMultiple choice testsHomework not collected
“He provide the and go over them together as a class.”
MATH90
“ !”
MATH90

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . All he does is a couple of problems on the board for your 2 hr long class and gives you at least 50+ problems for ”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews (2 online, 16 in person), highlighting teaching failures and workload stress. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He doesn't teach the material well.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ ”

📚

24/100

“gives you at least 50+ problems for ”

🗣️ Clarity Issues

20/100

“I could not understand his heavy accent!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His tactics are poor and un engaging.
  • when explaining problems he tends to get them wrong
  • If you want to learn the material, you have to look at the book yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting him to give me my current grade is like pulling teeth
  • you'll most likely pass.
  • for those who struggle in because you will not learn much.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • He doesn't respond quickly to emails and took .
  • .
  • I also went up to ask him a question and he didn't know how to answer it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews with a , but some older conflicting praise and mixed name references reduce certainty.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH156 reviews
MATH905 reviews
MATH503 reviews
MATH602 reviews
151 review
Show 1 more courses
501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1