AI Rate Professor

Science

Robyn Waayers

BIO200 · ANATOMY200 · BIO260 · ANATOMY · ZOO200 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
47.62%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend every class, write every word, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture Note DependentNo Makeup QuizzesTough Spelling GraderStudy Guide UsefulPolarizing BIO200
  • Older reviews love her energy and ; recent ones call lectures useless and self-taught.
  • Attendance and missed classes or a failed first exam.
  • You can earn an A with heavy note-taking and study guides, but leniency is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with constant note-taking and study guides, but , and no makeups raise the cost.

Single online review calls it easy A with effort; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

BIO200 volume, memorization tables, and frequent quizzes make the content demanding for many students.

; one online review found it easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

makeups, and possible drop after two misses.

In-person policies are strict; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; older praise clashes with and rigid-policy complaints.

Nearly ; the lone online student would not take her again despite a good grade.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Spelling counts, no quiz makeups, late quizzes lose half credit, and .

Format shift

In-person comments dominate strict-policy evidence; online review felt more forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

and labs, plus heavy memorization, but not universally described as overwhelming.

Format shift

and weekly quizzes; online notes longer lectures more than raw workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Energetic and clear for many older students, while and self-teaching is required.

Format shift

; the one online review liked her care but not lecture organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Four exams, frequent quizzes, and memorization tables drive the .

Format shift

and exam centered; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person BIO200 is lecture-and-quiz heavy with useful study guides for some and .

Main concern

Strict lateness and feedback.

What students said

“If you fail the / be dropped.”
BIO200
“Her study guides show exactly what to study for in each test.”
BIO200
“If you're late on a quiz day you'll be deducted 50% no matter what.”
BIO200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One but says lectures are long and disorganized while still an easy A with effort.

Main concern

Online lectures felt strung out and .

What students said

“online lectures are a and hard to get the .”
BIO200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and spelling, with harsh timing and .

Lecture-based examsFill-in tablesSpelling countedNo makeup quizzesStudy guides provided

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing, grade spelling, and use study guides that help only if you also master lecture notes.

Spelling graded50 multiple choice plus writingStudy guidesNo late quiz credit
“She graded you for spelling.”
BIO200
“If you're late on a quiz day you'll be deducted 50% no matter what.”
BIO200
“ : filling in a blank table with key terms and definitions.”
BIO200

Online

Online tests follow lectures; book is secondary if you watch carefully.

Lecture-based tests
“ so but use it.”
BIO200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and quizzes, and lots of them, but is extremely fair, and gives students clear guidance on what material will be tested.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (1 online, 34 in person), highlighting polarization on teaching quality and rigid policies. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Lectures helped very little, and I felt the need to write down EVERYTHING said to understand the concept.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ !!”

🚫

14/100

“ if you miss two lectures or if you don't get over a 60% on the ”

⚖️

34/100

“She graded you for spelling. Need to know your material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were very interesting and .
  • Slideshows are not useful, sometimes she talks about random things
  • Awesome lectures, easy to follow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A if you put in the time.
  • Test are so hard study guide does not help.
  • You will walk away from this class knowing something.

Theme 3

⏰ About Policies

  • If you miss a .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews across many years show a clear older-positive versus newer-critical split with enough detail for solid inference.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

BIO20026 reviews
2003 reviews
ZOO2003 reviews
ANATOMY1 review
ANATOMY2001 review
Show 1 more courses
BIO2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2