AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Tamara Holthaus

CHDV152B · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can plan for and meet participation expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy fast-track courseDetailed accessible lecturesParticipation expectationsTime-consuming projectTough grader on participation
  • The single review paints CHDV152B as a manageable 8-week online class with .
  • The main time sink is the .
  • She expects solid participation and is tagged a , but the student still earned a B+ and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The only student called the fast-track course pretty easy and finished with a B+, with workload .

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is described as pretty easy for an 8-week course, with lectures that are well detailed and easy to access.

Evidence is online-only from a single CHDV152B review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

The and praises accessible lectures despite tough participation standards.

Recommendation rests on one positive online review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but the overall grade outcome still landed at B+.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Workload

Light

70/100

Course is called pretty easy overall, with the environmental rating as the main time-consuming piece.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Lectures are described as well detailed and easily accessible.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on participation and a .

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online review describes an easy 8-week infant/toddler course with detailed lectures and a .

Main concern

Participation standards can feel strict and the .

What students said

“it was pretty easy as it was a fast track 8 weeks course.”
CHDV152B
“The environmental rating was a little time consuming, so definitely plan accordingly and make time to finish!”
CHDV152B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

No clear exam policy described

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The single online review focuses on projects and .

Project-based workParticipation expectations
“The environmental rating was a little time consuming, so definitely plan accordingly and make time to finish!”
CHDV152B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“lectures are well detailed and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review of CHDV152B. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Easy Fast Track

78/100

“it was pretty easy as it was a fast track 8 weeks course.”

⏱️

70/100

“The environmental rating was a little time consuming, so definitely plan accordingly and make time to finish!”

🎯

78/100

“lectures are well detailed and .”

Theme 1

📚 About Course Load

  • pretty easy as it was a fast track 8 weeks course
  • The environmental rating was a little time consuming

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are well detailed and
  • She does have expectations for your participation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review exists, so scores rest on a very small sample with limited cross-checks.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHDV152B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values