AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jason Eggerman

PSYCH205 · PSYC100 · PSCY205 · PSYCH258 · PSYC205 · SOC205 · PSYC101 · SOC201 · PSYC155 · PSYCH100 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him if and are willing to study hard for fair but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturerTough GraderTest HeavyHelpful PowerPointsExtra Credit
  • and notes online.
  • Exams and .
  • and hard work often recover a rough start.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Getting an A usually needs real study because exams are conceptual and , though helps.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro psych can feel easy with PowerPoints, but stats courses are hard and conceptual.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

cannot be made up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

if you put in the work, despite some tough-grader complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students often call him a tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and quizzes are regular but many say the load is manageable with .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and helpful PowerPoints.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and and limited papers.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and PowerPoints but and conceptual exams.

Main concern

Strict grading and .

What students said

“ . Almost nothing seemed good enough for him.”
PSYC100
“he is a . questions in them, just conceptual”
PSYC205
“This has been one of the . Professor Eggerman makes the and easy to understand.”
PSYC205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard and conceptual rather than pure memorization, with some .

Conceptual ExamsTest HeavyExtra CreditIn-Person Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and concepts; quizzes can be frequent and unforgiving.

Conceptual ExamsRandom QuizzesExtra Credit
“ questions in them, just conceptual, so you must learn the material”
PSYC205
“If you are sick oh still show up for class he has 10 random quizes and you can't make them up.”
PSYC101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was so afraid of this class as stats is NOT my thing...I failed 1st 2 exams and Got A's on the last 3 due to his help and excellent teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

80/100

“Professor Eggerman makes the and easy to understand.”

⚖️

38/100

“ . Almost nothing seemed good enough for him.”

👍

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • do, sticks to the syllabus
  • He does an excellent job at explaining the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • not an easy A
  • very hard class
  • lots of , do it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is fun, fair, and always ready to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

21 in-person reviews span many years with consistent praise for clarity and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYC2054 reviews
PSYCH1004 reviews
PSYC1003 reviews
PSYCH2053 reviews
SOC2052 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PSCY2051 review
PSYC1011 review
PSYC1551 review
PSYCH2581 review
SOC2011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values