AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Claude Ognibene

ACCT202 · ACC202 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Prefer him in person if you like tough interactive lectures; if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingLots of homeworkMandatory zoomFun in personDisorganized online
  • In-person older reviews often praise tough-but-fun teaching and .
  • Online reviews are largely negative about organization, English writing quality, and mandatory Zoom.
  • You can get solid grades with , but the experience depends heavily on format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Many students still get As or Bs, but , and strict deductions make the A require real work.

Online students report As with frustration; and heavy practice.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Accounting and spreadsheet content is repeatedly called tough with and exams.

Both formats rate difficulty mid-high; in-person sometimes hits 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly mandatory, including weekly Zoom for some online sections.

In-person mandatory participation; online often requires sync Zoom despite being labeled online.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

because online experience is poor, while .

In-person recommendations are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students report and , though clear criteria tags appear sometimes.

Format shift

Online cites no-feedback deductions; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, multiple platforms, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

; online adds multi-platform chaos.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Strong in-person entertainment and and unclear communication.

Format shift

Teaching quality is much better in person than online based on comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and multiple exams all matter.

Format shift

In-person notes 4 exams/quizzes/homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews split between best-teacher praise for analogies and engagement versus vague aggressive lecture style and pop quizzes.

Main concern

Material is tough and some students say he expects you to read his mind.

What students said

“This is one of the .”
ACCT202
“ ".”
ACCT202

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report chaotic platforms, mandatory weekly Zoom, poor written English, and As.

Main concern

Disorganization and .

What students said

“It's an online course but typically.”
ACC202
“The online work is a .”
ACCT202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as long and difficult with practice support, plus pop quizzes; .

Long difficult examsPop quizzesPractice examsMandatory Zoom

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, and pop questions.

Long difficult examsPractice examsPop quizzes
“The and difficult but if you study you should do fine.”
ACCT202
“4 Exams, 4 homework assignments, 4 quizzes”
ACCT202

Online

Online reviews emphasize homework systems and .

Mandatory weekly ZoomMultiple homework platformsAsync plus passwords
“its asynchronous but you need to either be on the zoom lectures or go back and find the passwords hidden.”
ACCT202
“ typically.”
ACC202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is hard and he will come off as really tough on the first day, but he is a really good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, emphasizing the . Credibility rating: Medium.

🖥️ Online Risk

25/100

“ .”

🏫 In-Person Strength

80/100

“ and analogies to make you understand the material.”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Tough material but if you know how to use modern tech, you can pass it. A lot of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the class fun and interesting.
  • His communication style during lectures is both vague and aggressive.
  • This teacher's written English is seriously subpar.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and difficult but if you study you should do fine.
  • You really have to work for your grade.
  • but

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online Format

  • The online work is a .
  • he uses multiple platforms to turn in homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews from 2016-2025 show a for medium confidence.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACCT2028 reviews
ACC2024 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values