AI Rate Professor

Graphic Communication

Wade Rollins

CGWM204 · GC204 · AFTEREFFECTS · GC165GC204 · GCIP140 · GC165 · FINALCUTPRO · GCIP240 · GC207204 · GCMW165 · GC141 · GC0 · GCIP141 · GCMW204 · GCMW205 · GC200207 · MULTIMEDIA · GC140 · GCFINALCUT · GRAPHICCOMM207 · GC142 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can self-teach and complete weekly work, but expect uneven feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProProject-basedLaid-backVideo demosDiscussion boards heavySubjective grading risk
  • and media work with little or no traditional testing
  • Many students find weekly projects easy if you put in effort and follow videos
  • Critiques note blurry or , and tedious peer comments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many get As by completing projects and discussions, but effort and creative quality matter and .

Online often says do the work and ; in-person varies more with prior design skill.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Introductory Photoshop and , though some sections feel tedious or design-demanding for newbies.

Online self-pace can feel easier content-wise; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and mandatory in-person participation for some courses.

Online is often flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority find him fun and knowledgeable, but recommendation rate is tempered by teaching video quality and .

Both formats show mixed but net-positive recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Often an , yet some report opinion-based scores and .

Format shift

and ; in-person also splits.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; not huge but can feel busy and comment-heavy online.

Format shift

Online discussion requirements .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong industry knowledge and project demos, but video quality, pace, and communication draw mixed reviews.

Format shift

In-person hands-on praise is warmer; online self-teaching complaints are more common.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Almost entirely projects, critiques, and .

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students often call him laid-back, hands-on, and fun with project freedom, though older reviews split on moodiness and .

Main concern

and occasional inflexible or .

What students said

“It is 1 assignment a week and not overwhelming amount of work.”
GC140
“ a low grade for things he didn't go over in his lectures.”
GCIP140

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is assignment and ; easy if you finish work, but some find videos weak and peer critiques exhausting.

Main concern

Tedious weekly peer comments and uneven or .

What students said

“there's no testing or and get graded. it's super easy”
GC140
“I found myself using youtube tutorials instead of the Professor's”
GC140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is project and critique .

No traditional testsProject-based assessmentDiscussion boardsWeekly assignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students report no tests and creative project freedom.

No tests just projectsProject freedomHands-on demos
“ . He's great.”
GC165
“Grades based on completion of 4 projects which you can do on whatever you want.”
GC204

Online

Online and discussion critiques.

No testing or quizzesDiscussion board critiquesWeekly projects
“there's no testing or and get graded”
GC140
“He gives 5 photoshop assignments plus online discussion where you have ”
GCIP140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work and discussion boards and you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting project-based work and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He provides videos for need to know to complete it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“Would recline the this professor an class !”

🛠️ Project Focus

85/100

“ . He's great.”

⚠️

40/100

“Grades based on his opinion instead of how you effectively followed instructions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • laidback professors
  • hands on approach
  • Funny as hell

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • super easy

Theme 3

💻 About Online Work

  • pre-recorded lessons
  • using youtube tutorials instead

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews over many years show mixed consistency and many sparse older comments, so confidence is medium despite sample size.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

GC1406 reviews
GCIP1405 reviews
GC1412 reviews
GC1422 reviews
GC2042 reviews
Show 16 more courses
GCIP1412 reviews
AFTEREFFECTS1 review
CGWM2041 review
FINALCUTPRO1 review
GC01 review
GC1651 review
GC165GC2041 review
GC2002071 review
GC2072041 review
GCFINALCUT1 review
GCIP2401 review
GCMW1651 review
GCMW2041 review
GCMW2051 review
GRAPHICCOMM2071 review
MULTIMEDIA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1