AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Leah Hoover

ACCT116A · ACCT201 · ACCT202 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
96.77%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

for tests, and you will learn and likely earn an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesCaring and accessibleTest heavy but fairClear grading criteriaLots of homework
  • Near-universal praise for and real student support in ACCT201/202
  • A is very achievable if you keep up with homework and study for tests
  • In-person is stronger; one online review called teaching non-existent via old videos

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students say and , though some call it not an easy A if you fall behind.

Online reviews more often say super easy A; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but students say it gets hard if you get off track.

Online difficulty ratings vary more; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and tags say skip class and you will not pass, though some sections list attendance optional.

; online often optional or not required for Zoom.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

About 97% would take again and comments overwhelmingly call her one of the .

; one harsh online outlier still sits against many strong online yes votes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and high A/A+ share make grades fair to generous if work is done.

Format shift

Online mentions and drops; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and multiple exams add steady work that is doable but not light.

Format shift

Online often lists heavy weekly homework volume; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students praise thorough interactive lectures, care, accessibility, and .

Format shift

; online is strong overall with one non-existent teacher complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and discussions plus multiple exams and occasional group projects.

Format shift

and several exams; in-person adds more live review games.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

strong exam prep and clear criteria; attendance and participation matter and tests carry weight.

Main concern

and falling behind makes the course hard to recover from.

What students said

“This teacher is so goated. Better than anybody named Glassman.”
ACCT201
“As long as you do the homework and come to the lectures, you're bound to pass this class.”
ACCT201
“Make sure you study a lot for the tests!!”
ACCT202

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most online students praise , and support; one strongly negative review said she only uploaded 2020 textbook videos and did not teach.

Main concern

and rare cases of weak live teaching presence online.

What students said

“This is a very easy online class! Your grade consists of , and 3 tests... it's a super easy A.”
ACCT201
“Non-existent teacher... Her version of "teaching" is uploading videos she made in 2020 of quickly going over the textbook.”
ACCT201
“Lecture videos are provided every week. Class consists of 12 discussion boards, 14 chapter's of hw, 4 pre-exam quizzes, & 4 exams.”
ACCT202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and need real studying, but she gives guides, reviews, and practice so the format is standard not harsh.

Multiple examsPre-exam quizzesStudy guidesIn-class reviewsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class prep; closed-book or proctoring software is not clearly stated.

Test heavyStudy guidesIn-class exam prepReview game day
“Make sure you study a lot for the tests!!”
ACCT202
“She grades based on 3 group projects, 4 tests (all including study guides and in class reviews), and hw.”
ACCT201

Online

Online sections use multiple exams and ; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

4 examsPre-exam quizzesHomework platformsNo clear proctoring details
“Class consists of 12 discussion boards, 14 chapter's of hw, 4 pre-exam quizzes, & 4 exams.”
ACCT202
“There are hw assignments once a week, discussion boards, 4 pre-exams, and 4 exams.”
ACCT201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews (12 online, 19 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She is a great professor! She was very thurough and made this class very easy to learn.”

👍

96/100

“I'm taking her again for ACC202 next semester and I would recommend her 100%.”

📈 Effort Pays Off

82/100

“If you put in the work, you can easily get an A.”

❤️ Care and Access

90/100

“She is always willing to meet up to help you understand and improve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • She was very thurough and made this class very easy to learn
  • Her lectures were interactive and it kept me learning
  • This teacher is so goated

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you put in the work, you can easily get an A
  • Make sure you study a lot for the tests!!
  • Not an easy A but she is a
  • As long as you do the homework and come to the lectures, you're bound to pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and understanding
  • Prof. Hoover was one of the while at Palomar
  • She worked with me to make sure I could complete things
  • She really wants her students to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

31 detailed reviews from 2019-2026 across online and in-person ACCT courses show strong consistency and .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT20124 reviews
ACCT2026 reviews
ACCT116A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2