AI Rate Professor

Fashion

Rachael Libolt

FCS101 · FASHION105 · FASH100 · FASH175 · FASH120 · HSMONLI · FASH105 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid if you can; if required for and expect and busy work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLots of homeworkUnclear instructionsBusy workPolarizing fashion faculty
  • Many students call grading nitpicky, unfair, or inconsistent with her own rubrics.
  • Workload is heavy with weekly work, VoiceThreads, and projects clustered together.
  • A and manageable if you follow the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Even capable students lose points for , so an A requires exact compliance more than deep learning.

Online reviews hammer unfair project deductions; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is often called busy work rather than intellectually brutal, but volume and .

; both formats still report heavy or excessive work.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

, though participation can still matter in some sections.

; some in-person comments still stress showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

, and many students warn fashion majors they are stuck with a least-favorite professor.

Recent online reviews are split; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and stories of tiny deductions that do not match rubrics define the .

Format shift

Harsh grading language is strongest in online FASH175 and .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and clustered projects create constant busy work.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework; online adds VoiceThread and discussion volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students split between finding her sweet and .

Format shift

A few online positives exist, but and poor clarity dominate the larger set.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects, weekly work, and blocks.

Format shift

Online mentions quizzes and projects; and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews often cite boring or rambling lectures, , and weak communication, with a few older positive notes about fairness and field trips.

Main concern

, and lectures that feel off-topic or useless for non-majors.

What students said

“ !!”
FASH100
“grades you down for stupid things like glue smudges or uneven edges.”
FASH105
“ and you will pass.”
FASH100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with tough project grading, confusing instructions, slow VoiceThread tools, and some praise for fairness when rubrics are followed.

Main concern

and unclear assignment instructions.

What students said

“ !!! so much points for not adding 1 small single thing.”
FASH175
“All of and confusing.”
FASH175
“I found her class really simple as long as ”
FASH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects and quizzes; reviews do .

Quizzes not too hardProject heavyRubric based grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unclear expectations rather than formal exam software or proctoring.

Project heavyRubric based grading
“grades you down for stupid things like glue smudges or uneven edges.”
FASH105

Online

Online comments mention manageable quizzes and evidence.

Quizzes not too hardProject heavyVoiceThread lectures
“ !”
FASH175
“ points for something simple if not unnecessary.”
FASH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! so much points for not adding 1 small single thing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting tough grading, workload, and mixed teaching tone. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

24/100

“She wont and if and wont give you another better option”

📚 Workload Load

26/100

“Work felt excessive rather than engaging.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“She's hands down one of .”

🙂 Minority Upside

70/100

“I found her class really simple as long as ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • !!!
  • and you will pass.
  • grades you down for stupid things like glue smudges or uneven edges.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were nothing but rambling on and on and on.
  • All of and confusing.
  • she cares for her people and has a passion for fashion.

Theme 3

💰 About Books and Busy Work

  • Don't bother buying textbooks for her classes.
  • A lot of busy work but overall a fun online class.
  • Very hard and i ended up spending many late nights just doing working for this elective course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews spanning many years with , and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

FASH1007 reviews
FASH1754 reviews
FASH1053 reviews
FASH1202 reviews
FASHION1051 review
Show 2 more courses
FCS1011 review
HSMONLI1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1