AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Alexandra Lowe

CHEMISTRY110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you show up and use her materials, but watch for organization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStraightforward ExpectationsCaring and ApproachableOrganization MixedHelpful MaterialsParticipation Matters
  • Two of three students praise her care, clarity, and willingness to help.
  • One in-person , and untaught test problems.
  • Sample size is tiny, so expectations can swing by section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Showing up and using practice materials can yield top grades, but if organization slips.

One in-person A+ and one online B support fairness; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is manageable with effort, but .

Positive reviews call material focused; the critical review cites low averages and new test problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

In-person attendance is mandatory and participation matters; the .

In-person is mandatory; the as optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Two of and praise her support, tempered by one strong organization complaint.

Online and ; the other in-person review is skeptical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but one report of shifting criteria and .

Format shift

Positive formats emphasize help and practice; negative in-person cites unstable criteria.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Slides, practice problems, and participation expectations without reports of .

Format shift

No strong format split on workload volume in the small sample.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Often caring and disorganization complaint.

Format shift

Online praise is high; and chaotic delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests and but uneven alignment reported.

Format shift

and quizzes; positive reviews stress practice materials.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with clear help and a frustrated review about chaos and low test averages.

Main concern

and tests covering material not taught.

What students said

“Great professor who focuses on the important material and is really straightforward with expectations.”
Chemistry-110
“Course was very unorganized and the .”
Chemistry-110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is highly positive, calling her sweet, approachable, and .

Main concern

, so online consistency is unproven.

What students said

“if .”
Chemistry-110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard difficulty overall, but .

Tests and quizzesPractice problems providedPossible untaught items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

when problems were not covered in class.

Low test averagesProblems not coveredChanging grading criteria
“We would get problems on tests that we did not go over. and quizzes.”
Chemistry-110

Online

No explicit online exam policy details beyond a positive overall course experience.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor who focuses on the important material and is really straightforward with expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, balancing praise and organization concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

64/100

“she's really good about replying to emails and provides lots of material such as slides and extra practice problems.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“Course was very unorganized and the .”

❤️ Approachable Style

80/100

“she made me feel comfortable enough to ask a question without feeling judged”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • focuses on the important material and is really straightforward with expectations
  • she genuinely wants to help her students she is approachable
  • if

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you show up to lecture and try, she'll help you out a lot
  • We would get problems on tests that we did not go over
  • and quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with mixed opinions and comments.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Chemistry-1103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1