AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Alex Kowalczyk

PSYCH210 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Proceed cautiously; evidence is thin and split between a strong online experience and a frustrating in person one.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed reviewsTest heavyExtra credit availableLecture heavyConflicting experiences
  • Only two reviews and they strongly disagree
  • Online student loved lectures and
  • In person student felt exams and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

helps, but multiple exams and automatic.

Online review is more optimistic; in person review implies harder grade clarity.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty sits around average with lengthy lectures and several exams.

Both reviews list difficulty as moderate; no strong easy or brain-burner signal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

In and participation matters in tags.

In person clearly requires attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One enthusiastic yes online is offset by a low-quality in person review with .

Online evidence recommends him; in person evidence does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Extra credit opportunities help, but .

Format shift

Online student feels supported; in person student questions lab and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and four exams.

Format shift

Both formats describe multi-part assessment rather than a light load.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is split between amazing online lectures and .

Format shift

Online praise contrasts sharply with in person criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Four exams plus labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online and in person both emphasize exams; in person also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in person student found , and a movie or potluck surprise-counted as a lab.

Main concern

and how informal activities are graded.

What students said

“ actually be studied as he would just tell us it "wasn't important", but would pop up on the exam.”
PSYCH210

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online student calls Alex down to earth, lecture-strong, extra-credit friendly, and highly recommendable.

Main concern

Course and quizzes.

What students said

“Alex is one of the most down to earth professors out there. He wants everyone to do well in his class”
PSYCH210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes; friendliness is mixed and not clearly open-book.

Four examsTest heavyLabs and quizzesExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and a movie or potluck counted as a lab.

Test heavyUnclear exam contentLab grade surprise
“he would just tell us it "wasn't important", but would pop up on the exam.”
PSYCH210

Online

Online review notes four exams, labs, activities, and .

Four examsLabsQuizzesExtra credit
“Graded on 4 exams, labs, in-class activities and quizzes.”
PSYCH210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Alex is one of the most down to earth professors out there.”

Voice snapshots generated from only 2 conflicting reviews, so findings are provisional. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Split Experiences

50/100

“ !”

📉

35/100

“ actually be studied”

🎁 Help

60/100

“several .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gives great lectures (via zoom for online)
  • Lectures were pretty lengthy
  • Lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Graded on 4 exams, labs, in-class activities and quizzes.
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews with opposite tones, limited grade data, and no long-term consistency make conclusions fragile.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1