AI Rate Professor

Business

Janeen Johnson-Foster

BUS205 · BUS104 · BUS100 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if , and accept picky grading for a workable B or hard-earned A.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGroup-project heavyUnclear instructionsTough picky gradingOutdated materialExtra credit available
  • Grades can be fine but and material outdated
  • Group projects and lots of and in person
  • Recommendation is mixed; many would avoid BUS205 specifically

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many report an easy B but a hard A , and .

Online has more easy-A claims with ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material itself is often called simple or basic, but volume of writing and group tasks raises friction.

Both formats call content simple yet tedious; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Most recent reviews say attendance or Zoom is not mandatory, sometimes with for watching recordings.

; some older in-person BUS100 sections required attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About two in ; praise for kindness clashes with and groups.

Online is mixed with some easy-A fans; in-person BUS205 reviews trend more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and never-full-credit complaints outweigh for many students.

Format shift

; some online students still report good final grades.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and publisher quizzes create high busywork load.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report heavy group and .

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Some call her kind and accessible; , and currency of material fall short.

Format shift

Online mixed on accessibility; weak.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and publisher tests rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Online leans publisher quizzes and group work; some in-person BUS100 called test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews often warn , and weak alignment between class and tests.

Main concern

Outdated curriculum and material.

What students said

“Please, for your . All of the material is outdated and old”
BUS205
“Easy to get a B but hard to get an A even though the material is super simple.”
BUS205

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report lots of group work, unclear or , and mixed feelings on fairness.

Main concern

and heavy group projects in online sections.

What students said

“Found work to be hard to understand instructions almost is never clear on what you're supposed to do.”
BUS205
“Professor Johnson-Fosters class was an easy A for me. Do the homework. Read the text.”
BUS205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and quizzes often run through textbook platforms; students complain about outdated editions and .

Publisher platform testsQuizzes from older editionsHomework and papers heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments note outdated tests, exam-heavy older BUS100 sections, and little study-guide support.

Outdated tests and quizzesExam heavy in some sectionsNo study guides
“the content learned in class.”
BUS205
“ for the cumulative final.”
BUS100

Online

, and tests that can be forgotten if not posted clearly.

Publisher website quizzesGroup assignmentsOptional Zoom extra credit
“Tests and so they easily forgotten about.”
BUS205
“Do the and you will pass.”
BUS205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy B, but you have to really work for the A. Lots of randomly assigned group so you better get lucky with what group you end up with.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (12 online, 9 in , and mixed recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“She clearly had no idea what she was doing. Lectures added nothing beyond the textbook.”

📦

30/100

“ and random draw (better hope you have a good team).”

⚖️

32/100

“She is a ”

👍 Split Recommendations

42/100

“Overall, she is a good teacher that I've had for 2 classes”

Theme 1

📝 About Instructions & Organization

  • instructions almost is never clear on what you're supposed to do
  • instructions the prof provided would be different than instructions for assign. provided in the textbook
  • Directions for

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • Easy to get a B but hard to get an A even though the material is super simple
  • Lots of tedious work but the
  • There was a lot of writing involved, but it was basic critical thinking

Theme 3

⚠️ About Curriculum & Value

  • All of the material is outdated and old
  • Do not buy the textbook as well
  • Class is pretty outdated and useless to the real world

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across online and in-person formats with rich detail, grade data, and a .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BUS20514 reviews
BUS1006 reviews
BUS1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values