AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Herminia Reyes

PHIL125 · PHILO101 · PHIL111 · PHIL101 · PHIL113 · LOGIC105 · PHILO115 · PHIL102 · 73108PHIL125 · PHILLOGI · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL115 · PHIL120 · PHIL100 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you want a very hard philosophy or logic course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSlow gradingHard written examsHarsh attitudeSelf-teach heavy
  • Most students warn others to avoid , and stressful class climate.
  • her exact lecture wording.
  • A minority who love hard philosophy and prepare intensely still respect her passion and rigor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for intense note-takers, but , and rarely cushioned by retakes or .

Both Online and In person report hard grading; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and fast or unclear delivery make the content feel draining for most students.

Both formats call the work hard; Online stresses unreadable e-lectures while In person stresses pace and board work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and students say missing class quickly hurts performance.

in-person classroom enforcement reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Overall take-again sentiment is low and most detailed reviews .

and In person; positive recommendations are a minority in both.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Repeated tough-grader tags, no retakes, little , and demands for near-exact wording dominate the record.

Format shift

Harsh grading is reported Online and In person; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and weekly quizzes or discussions create a high time load.

Format shift

Online emphasizes long exams and reading; In person emphasizes lecture density and memorization.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many students report , and poor communication despite some praise for subject passion.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on e-lectures and ; In person complaints focus on yelling and handwriting.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Long written exams and tough quizzes dominate, with papers and discussions secondary in many sections.

Format shift

and In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews often describe aggressive teaching, hard-to-read board work, mandatory attendance pressure, and .

Main concern

Harsh classroom tone, unclear handwriting, and .

What students said

“ ! Doesnt explain much in class, has absolutely hideous handwriting”
PHILLOGI
“ the class”
PHILOSOPHY
“she is such a great professor and so passionate about what she is teaching.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students frequently report delayed grading, rigid no-extension policies, dense hard-to-read e-lectures, and .

Main concern

, and subjective tough scoring on long written work.

What students said

“She is the laziest professor I have ever had... STAY AWAY”
PHILOSOPHY
“Often takes over a and exams”
PHIL113
“She was the only professor that did not give an extension.”
PHIL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are long, written, and strictly graded against her lectures, with little flexibility.

Long written examsTough gradingLecture-wording requiredNo late workSlow grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and thorough written answers, sometimes with prompts given in advance.

Essay examsMemory heavyPrompts reviewed in class
“ and you need to be very thorough with your answers.”
PHIL101
“ but she gives you the prompt before and goes over all of the questions”
PHIL101

Online

Online exams are long written tests often based on dense e-lectures, with no late work and .

Long written examsNo late workSlow gradingLecture-based answers
“ and long, and not to mention she grades very VERY tough.”
PHIL113
“ , but are a .”
PHIL125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Worst online class I have ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (19 Online, 31 In , and online friction. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

25/100

“ ! Doesnt explain much in class, has absolutely hideous handwriting”

⚖️

18/100

“If you do not answer her questions with her exact wording given in her notes she will give you an F.”

⏳

30/100

“Often takes over a month to grade assignments and so ever.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Yells at the class and will make you feel bad
  • Reyes spits philospophical FIRE! This woman is passionate.
  • Her lectures hurt my brain; they were just regurgitated information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and they are very long
  • Hard work for a random grade

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She refused to give us any extension despite the site being shut down
  • She has not graded anything since week 2
  • . I liked philosophy and now I hate it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and and low recommendation, with a stable minority of positive hardcore supporters.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 58
3 out of 59
2 out of 510
1 out of 519

Course coverage

PHIL10112 reviews
PHIL1025 reviews
PHIL1135 reviews
PHIL1154 reviews
PHIL1254 reviews
Show 11 more courses
712183 reviews
PHIL1203 reviews
PHILOSOPHY3 reviews
LOGIC1052 reviews
PHIL1002 reviews
PHILLOGI2 reviews
1251 review
73108PHIL1251 review
PHIL1111 review
PHILO1011 review
PHILO1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1