AI Rate Professor

Computer Informational Tech.

Rand Green

CSWB110 · CSNT111 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Only take Rand Green if you can teach yourself from the book and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMostly Self TaughtSlow GradingDisorganized MaterialsQuiz RetakesLow Teaching Presence
  • Many students describe a .
  • Assignments can be easy and , but grading is slow and .
  • Scattered outdated materials and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Assignments and can make a high grade reachable, but and missing feedback still create risk.

Online reviews mention for full credit; in-person reviews still call the class easy but poorly supported.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and straightforward assignments if you stay caught up.

Both formats describe easy or .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

as not mandatory and several students say they never saw the instructor.

Online and as optional or irrelevant.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is low because , and disorganized materials.

Negative tone is strong in both formats, with a few mixed online comments about easy quizzes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Not harsh on weekly work and help, but and criteria can be unclear.

Format shift

Online students note full credit on assignments and retakeable quizzes; both formats complain about slow returns.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly reading and assignments are manageable, though some report lots of homework and 2-3 hours of lecture work daily.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reasonable due dates but and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say the course is self-taught from outdated materials with bare-minimum instructor participation.

Format shift

Criticism of absence and disorganization appears in both online and in-person labeled reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment , and quizzes rather than major proctored exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize weekly work and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Even tagged in-person reviews often describe online-style self-taught book work with delayed grades and minimal teaching.

Main concern

Unorganized outdated materials and bare-minimum teaching .

What students said

“This is basically a self-taught course. This professor does the bare minimum in teaching.”
CSWB110
“Sometimes it could take up to 4 weeks to receive your grades for weekly assignments.”
CSWB110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are largely self-paced textbook work with automated grading, , and very limited instructor presence.

Main concern

Extremely slow or missing grades and .

What students said

“He had a program both make and grade the assignments. Didnt see this dude all semester.”
CSNT111
“Professor has and the semester is almost over.”
CSWB110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and reviews never mention webcam proctoring or Lockdown Browser.

Quiz RetakesHighest Score KeptNo Proctoring Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person labeled reviews still describe quizzes without feedback and .

Quizzes Without Feedback
“ . No possible way to see what questions you got wrong.”
CSWB110

Online

but cannot see wrong answers to learn from mistakes.

Quiz RetakesNo Wrong-Answer Review
“if you fail a a good score, and it keeps the highest score”
CSNT111
“After completing the you got wrong”
CSWB110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is basically a self-taught course. This professor does the bare minimum in teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews focused on self-teaching, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Minimal Teaching Presence

28/100

“Didnt see this dude all semester.”

🐢 Slow or Missing Grades

25/100

“Professor has and the semester is almost over.”

📚 Self Taught From Book

30/100

“Class is self taught from the book not much teacher participation.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor does the bare minimum in teaching
  • Materials were scattered and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He does grade very slowly but he is not harsh at all

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Organization

  • Files that and outdated
  • I almost missed a 5 weeks into the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2019-2022 give consistent themes on self-teaching and , but sample size is modest and quality scores are mixed.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CSWB1105 reviews
CSNT1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1