AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Heidi Phelps

PHIL100 · PHIL101 · PHIL113 · PHILOSOPHY115 · PHIL102 · PHILL115 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILOSOPHY101 · PHIL115 · PHIL200 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
7.69%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle massive writing loads and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSo many papersSlow graderLots of homeworkOff-topic tangentsPolarizing reviews
  • Paper and homework volume is extreme, especially in PHIL200 and fast-track formats
  • Grading and until semester end
  • , while newer reviews strongly advise avoiding her

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and piled deadlines make an A a grind even when some students still earn high marks.

Online and ; older easier notes do not erase the modern workload.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Critical and multi-page papers keeps the course intellectually and practically demanding.

Online fast-track and in-person PHIL200 both describe heavy challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others say it is not required or that if you read.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and recent comments repeatedly call her disorganized, unresponsive, and overloaded with papers.

Online ; in person is split but still often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Clear rubrics appear sometimes, yet tough-grader tags, vague prompts, and .

Format shift

; a few older in-person students found her more generous.

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

, and discussion boards regularly swamp students.

Format shift

Online fast tracks and in-person PHIL200 both describe overwhelming writing volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Passion and approachability show in older praise, but many report unprepared lectures, tangents, and absent online support.

Format shift

In-person quality is mixed; online teaching experience is consistently poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and discussion boards outweigh occasional quizzes and midterms.

Format shift

Online and ; some sections still include midterms and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some love her energy and learning gains, many call lectures unfocused kid stories with and slow grades.

Main concern

Tangents, unclear expectations, and .

What students said

“Pretty impossible to get an A unless you sit on your computer 24/7...”
PHIL200
“the professor constantly talks about her kids and her life stories.”
PHIL200

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PHIL200 is widely panned for dumped paper stacks, late modules, ignored emails, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“she provided the semester.”
PHIL200
“An until the last week of school”
PHIL200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes quizzes, midterms, and student-friendly open testing.

Multiple long papersQuizzesMidterm examScantron-style tests in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person includes quizzes, midterms, finals, and papers; and scantron tests.

Quizzes match examsScantron testsMultiple papers
“ as the midterm and and no need to study.”
PHIL101

Online

Online sections mention quizzes, midterms, and many papers, but do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

QuizzesMidterm examLong papers
“3 essays, 6 Logic in Society's, and 4 quizzes and .”
PHIL200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pretty impossible to get an A unless you sit on your computer 24/7...”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, , and polarized teaching views. Credibility rating: High.

📄 Paper Overload

14/100

“All the papers are 6-10 pages on very broad topics.”

🐢 Slow or

20/100

“she provided the semester.”

👎 Low Recommendation

18/100

“ ”

👨‍👩‍👧 Off-Topic Lectures

30/100

“the professor constantly talks about her kids and her life stories.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the professor constantly talks about her kids and her life stories.
  • She's a , but an awful professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Pretty impossible to get an A unless you sit on your computer 24/7...
  • four 6-10 page papers on top of , and discussion boards.
  • An until the last week of school

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Honestly, she is a sweet lady.
  • Heidi is freakin' AWESOME!!!
  • She's very knowledgable and absolutely loves the subject.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine detailed reviews spanning many years show consistent themes of heavy papers and .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 512
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHIL20014 reviews
PHIL1018 reviews
PHIL1155 reviews
PHIL1023 reviews
PHIL1002 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1151 review
347721 review
PHIL1131 review
PHILL1151 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY1011 review
PHILOSOPHY1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B 6

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2