AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Jones

MATH141 · MATH105 · MATH205 · CALCULUS · MATH120 · MATH60 · 105SUMMER · MATH110 · MTH60 · 114 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
34.38%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSkips stepsExtremely hard testsLots of homeworkTeach yourselfNice but confusing
  • Many students say and leave them learning the material alone.
  • and very hard exams dominate the grade, with frequent tough-grader reports.
  • A minority who keep up with homework and and passable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even strong math students report struggling for and .

Both online and and exams.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Pace is fast, concepts feel under-explained, and material difficulty is consistently rated high.

Online comments stress speed and self-teaching; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

16/100

and skip-class tags common.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and many warn others away despite a minority of .

Negatives dominate both formats; a few in-person students still praise him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

and tests make the class feel like a full-time job.

Format shift

Heavy load appears across online and in-person courses.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Some students find him nice and helpful after class, but many say he skips steps, rushes, and confuses the class.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially negative on clarity; in-person is mixed but still mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Quizzes, midterms, and as practice for .

Format shift

Test-heavy pattern holds online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call exams extremely hard and , while a if you show up.

Main concern

Fast lectures, dense homework, and prior math students.

What students said

“ ! EXTREEEMELY!”
MATH141
“You must teach yourself everything.”
MATH141
“If you show up, participate, and do the A.”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online math sections are widely described as .

Main concern

and tests makes catching mistakes critical.

What students said

“You will be needing to learn the material on your own because of and lack of explanation.”
MTH60
“Always makes mistakes that you have to look out for in every single lecture.”
MATH60
“His class is like a full time job. It's like a hazing exercise.”
MATH205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are strict and often harder than class examples, making them a major risk.

Test heavyExtremely hard examsHomework-linked tests for someNo notes on testsQuizzes every class

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are repeatedly called extremely difficult, sometimes with no notes and little match to lecture examples.

Extremely hard examsNo notes on testsTests harder than homeworkFew tests, high weight
“ ! EXTREEEMELY!”
MATH141
“He doesn't let you use any notes during the tests.”
MATH110
“The than the ones he gives for homework.”
MATH110

Online

, and unclear prep from lectures.

Quiz every classTest heavyLecture mistakesHeavy homework
“ .”
MATH60
“If you have a problem with math and you find it hard for yourself to learn .”
MATH60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I AM DEAD SERIOUS! DO NOT TAKE for calc 2!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in person), , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Clarity

28/100

“You will be needing to learn the material on your own because of and lack of explanation.”

📉

22/100

“ ! EXTREEEMELY!”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He skips steps
  • teaches way too fast
  • You have to teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and tough
  • His class is like a full time job
  • Loads of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is a nice guy
  • really cares about his students
  • always willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

114

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years and courses show a large, consistent pattern of and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 516
3 out of 517
2 out of 520
1 out of 536

Course coverage

MATH6017 reviews
MATH1109 reviews
MATH1056 reviews
MATH1416 reviews
MATH2055 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MTH602 reviews
105SUMMER1 review
1101 review
500261 review
CALCULUS1 review
MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

3

D 2 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

7

Fail 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3