AI Rate Professor

English

Kellie Miller

ENG202 · ENGLISH101 · ENG100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you want a and low support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersUnaccommodatingPlays FavoritesHeavy Reading
  • Most students call her a harsh, unaccommodating grader on papers with .
  • and frequent essays with little perceived fairness.
  • Personality complaints include bias, favorites, and unfriendly classroom tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

yet still draw harsh grades, so an A is rare without exceptional alignment to her standards.

Online and ; the lone A+ is an older in-person outlier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Frequent essays and and pace demanding.

and reading; difficulty ratings cluster high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping hurts, with participation mattering.

; in-person is mixed but participation is emphasized.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Only about one in and attitude.

; the single yes is from 2018 in-person ENG202.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and failed paper effort show very strict evaluation.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , and frequent essays create a heavy writing load.

Format shift

Online and ; one online note says too much work overall.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe unfriendly tone, bias, poor accommodation, and little inspiring teaching.

Format shift

; online is uniformly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and essays with quizzes and reading rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, unfriendly tone, and favorites, with one older positive outlier.

Main concern

Favorites and condescending tone make success feel uneven even when work is completed.

What students said

“Not accommodating at all”
ENG100
“The most miserable person I have ever met. Extremely unfriendly with all of her students.”
ENG100
“Awesome teacher. She assigned a lot of reading so there were a lot of quizzes.”
ENG202

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online , and heavy workload.

Main concern

and communication is unreliable.

What students said

“Way too hard of a grader. I took so much time and and still didnt meet the expectations.”
ENG100
“She is very bias to students and if she doesnt feel like it. Not Accommodating At all”
ENG100
“To much work”
ENGLISH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and quizzes; one older review notes rewrites and .

Frequent EssaysReading QuizzesRewrites Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person notes many quizzes from reading, essays with possible rewrites, and debates for .

Reading QuizzesEssay RewritesExtra Credit Debates
“At the end of the and allows for rewrites for 4 out of 5 essays just talk to her as soon as .”
ENG202

Online

Online reviews focus on paper grading hardness without clear proctoring or .

Paper Heavy
“Way too hard of a grader. I took so much time and and still didnt meet the expectations.”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Way too hard of a grader. I took so much time and and still didnt meet the expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 English-course reviews with and tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The most miserable person I have ever met. Extremely unfriendly with all of her students.”

⚖️

15/100

“ ”

📝 Workload Pressure

22/100

“To much work”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“Not Accommodating At all”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kinda condescending, does play favorites, not a hard class but not really inspiring
  • She is very bias to students and if she doesnt feel like it.
  • A decent teacher. LOTS of reading and frequent essays

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Way too hard of a grader.
  • for the students who aren't particularly liked, passinghard work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Not accommodating at all
  • Extremely unfriendly with all of her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly short reviews from 2018-2022 with strong negative consistency but limited detail depth.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG1005 reviews
ENG2023 reviews
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1