AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Erin Lane

PSYC225 · PSYCHOLOGY100 · PSYC125 · PSY205 · PSYC361 · PSYC205 · PSY225 · SOC205 · PSYCH100 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Strong option for stats if , and use ; expect uneven organization and course-to-course variance.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStats savior for manyLecture and test heavyLoads of extra creditSlow grade postingPop quizzes risk
  • Many stats students say she breaks hard material down and gets non-math people through with notes and care.
  • Tests can be hard and classes lecture-heavy, but and .
  • , and grade tracking frustrate others, especially in PSYCH100.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common with notes, draft checks, and heavy , but and effort is required.

Online and or ; psych sections feel less automatic.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats and psych content range from straightforward with and .

Online stats called simple if ; and condensed terms.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Skip class and you will not pass tags appear often even .

; online still expects show-up and timed tests.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

About two-thirds enthusiasm driven by stats success and care, offset by organization and psych course complaints.

; in-person has both love and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and and occasional tough-grader tags.

Format shift

; grade posting is often slow.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and occasional draft-check paper loads.

Format shift

Online workload is steps and tests; courses.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and supportive; , and loses organization.

Format shift

Online shows both high care and low effort critiques; in-person is highly polarized by course.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy and in some courses.

Format shift

Online and ; some psych courses add research paper drafts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

inspirational stats teaching versus disorganized psych sections with pop quizzes and self-teaching.

Main concern

, and occasional chaos around quizzes or syllabus changes.

What students said

“if you . Lane because she will get you through it”
PSY205
“ and never graded anything”
PSYCH100
“she offers loads of extra credit. So, If you don't do well on the and you will get an A.”
PSYC225

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online stats students split between deep praise for care and , and low effort.

Main concern

and if you need flexibility.

What students said

“ and ask questions. Professor Lane is always open to slowing down and explaining everything until you understand.”
PSY205
“ . .”
PSYC205
“she has been more than willing to advocate for and help me”
PSY205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard but .

Test heavyPop quizzesOpen note quizzes/testsExtra creditTimed test windows online

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person mixes hard tests, chapter quizzes, pop quizzes, and .

Hard testsPop quizzesOpen note quizzes and testsExtra credit
“ . Read the chapters it will help you!”
PSYC225
“She and tests”
100
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
PSYCH100

Online

slot; course still feels passable if you follow steps.

Timed single-slot testsTest heavyZoom recordings posted
“ .”
PSYC205
“Great elementary stats class!”
PSY205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you . Lane because she will get you through it. I love her!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (3 online, 18 in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Stats are hard and she breaks everything down step by step.”

📈 Grade Recovery

62/100

“she offers loads of extra credit. So, If you don't do well on the and you will get an A.”

⚠️ Organization Issues

35/100

“ and never graded anything”

❤️ Student Support

80/100

“Super caring about her students!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are fun, relatable and to the point
  • She explained everything very well and was always there for us
  • and rambles a lot

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class if you just follow the steps
  • As long as you try, it's really not a hard class

Theme 3

📝

  • She and tests
  • BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across many years and courses provide rich, consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSY2056 reviews
PSYC2253 reviews
PSYCH1003 reviews
PSYC2052 reviews
1001 review
Show 6 more courses
2251 review
PSY 2251 review
PSYC1251 review
PSYC3611 review
PSYCHOLOGY1001 review
SOC2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 5 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1