AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hien Nguyen

STATS120 · MATH200 · MATH160 · MATH115 · MATH206 · MATH15 · MATH120 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MAT60 · MATH135 · MATH130 · MATH45 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

class with big grade buffers; online is less polished.

Best fit · Easy A HunterExtra credit machineStudy guides match testsCaring math professorMandatory attendanceAccent but supportive
  • and heavy makes strong grades very attainable
  • , and a must-take for math-anxious learners
  • Online sections show weaker communication, messy handwriting, and lower satisfaction

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Study , and abundant make an A very achievable with consistent work.

In person evidence strongly supports easy As; online comments are more cautious and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is standard math difficulty, but his guides and scaffolding make it feel more beginner-friendly.

In person students call hard classes surprisingly manageable; online students still rate moderate difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping can sink you, though a few note more flexibility.

Online and in person both lean mandatory; if you attend.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students, especially in and grade-friendly structure.

In person is strongly positive; both .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, and test-aligned study guides create very student-friendly grading.

Format shift

Generosity is clearest in person; online has less explicit grade-boost detail.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and some classes are test-heavy, but many say it is manageable and not overwhelming.

Format shift

; in person often describes moderate work with high reward.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and highly useful study guides despite accent and some lecture-reading.

Format shift

In person excellence is consistent; and response issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and occasional extra-credit boosts shaping outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

caring, clear criteria, study guides that , and strong pass rates.

Main concern

Attendance is often mandatory and .

What students said

“Good teacher, easy A”
MATH15
“If he is teaching the . .”
STATS120
“ because they are similar to his study guides.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but , and slow replies hurt the experience.

Main concern

Communication and lecture clarity online are weaker, with and uneven support.

What students said

“Thick accent and messy handwriting.”
MATH135
“I tried and .”
MATH45

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are highly predictable from study guides, often with and .

Study guides match testsExtra credit on testsDrop lowest testNo surprise questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests closely mirror study guides, often with and sometimes a dropped lowest test.

Study guides match testsExtra creditDrop lowest testNo surprise questions
“ because they are similar to his study guides.”
MATH120
“He . Good teacher, easy A”
MATH15
“Gives study guides for on the test.”
MAT60

Online

Online reviews ; students mainly say do the homework and tests are manageable.

Homework-driven prepLimited exam-policy detail
“Do the .”
MATH135

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If he is teaching the . . Im horrible at Math and got a B in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews (2 Online, 21 In person), highlighting grade support and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Support

86/100

“He cares about his student. and .”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

84/100

“Good teacher, easy A”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“If he is teaching the . .”

💻 Online Friction

40/100

“I tried and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome guy! If you put in the work he will make sure you pass.
  • He shows you how to solve the problem step by step.
  • Thick accent but amazing teacher!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • study guides are the same questions that are on the test
  • He gives a lot of
  • Way too much .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about his students.
  • Plus free candy on review nights!
  • he is a great professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

23 reviews spanning 2016-2025 with detailed recurring themes and consistent grade outcomes, mostly in person.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews
MATH1153 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH152 reviews
MATH2002 reviews
MAT601 review
MATH1601 review
MATH2061 review
MATH451 review
MATH601 review
STATS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2