AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Padam Singh

MATH30 · MATH120 · MATH15 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH50 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and ace a small number of high-stakes tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyWeak ExplanationsSkip Risk HighInconsistent PresencePhone-Out Classroom
  • Many students and classes lose engagement.
  • Grades often .
  • ; a minority still find lower-level math easy if self-driven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some lower-level sections feel easy, but and weak teaching make a true A risky.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty varies by course number; complaints focus more on teaching gaps than abstract theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some sections allow skipping if you can pass tests; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

wasted time and unlearned material.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tests can be 70-75% of the grade with few chances, so mistakes are costly.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

and matters some, but the real pressure is sparse high-stakes testing.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Repeated claims of , and students on phones.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple reviews put most of the grade on 2-4 tests plus pop quizzes, with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections range from easy lower-level courses to harsh , and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ career.”
MATH120
“DO NOT I repeat DO NOT get this professor.”
MATH30
“easy class if you pay attention. Very easygoing!”
MATH50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and pop quizzes dominate, sometimes covering material students say was never taught.

High Test WeightFew TestsPop QuizzesMaterial Not Taught

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes/tests on untaught material after absences.

Pop Quizzes70% TestsFew High-Stakes Exams
“beware of . Tests were worth 70% of the grade, but we .”
MATH120
“he decided to give us all kinds of !”
MATH120
“75% test 15% homework is his grading scale”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ career. Holy cow, do yourself a favor and DONT take this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews with no online sample, focusing on teaching gaps and test weight. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“DO NOT I repeat DO NOT get this professor.”

📊

32/100

“Tests were worth 70% of the grade, but we .”

⚠️ Classroom Engagement

25/100

“everyone is on their phone because his teaching techniques suck.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hes very quiet and teaching styles are the worst.
  • hard to understand!!
  • Hes funny. He is willing to help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you really need an A, don't risk it with this class.
  • easy class if you pay attention.
  • your grade depends on 3-4 tests

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • He literally didn't show up for an entire month and a half.
  • didnt let half of the class in the zoom
  • he's usually like 10 minutes late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews from 2015-2021 give consistent teaching concerns, though difficulty and grades vary by course level.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH603 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1101 review
MATH151 review
MATH301 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1