AI Rate Professor

History

Anthony Snellings

HIST101 · HIST102 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid HIST102 with him unless you tolerate long dull lectures; HIST101 may be an easy A for some.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyTough graderBoring lecturesGraded by few thingsGet ready to read
  • In-person HIST102 reviews describe , and .
  • One HIST101 student called it an easy A with joke online tests and chill storytelling.
  • Online HIST102 was only okay with , and unused textbooks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

HIST102 students expect low grades with and , while one HIST101 student reports an easy A.

Online is work-for-your-grade; in-person HIST102 is hard to grade well, HIST101 reportedly easy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is standard history, but , and .

; in-person adds marathon lectures and source readings.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, though some students say class adds little value.

; in-person students question its benefit.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most HIST102 reviewers would not take him again and tell others to stay away despite one easy HIST101 outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and students expecting C-range outcomes without .

Format shift

HIST101 outlier felt generous; HIST102 reviews feel strict.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

2-3 textbook chapters weekly, extra sources, long lectures, discussions, and essays.

Format shift

Online is discussion and essay heavy; and lecture heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Dominant theme is long boring lectures with few visuals and students leaving class.

Format shift

Single online review is lukewarm; in-person HIST102 is strongly negative, HIST101 positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Essays, discussion boards, midterms, finals, and limited grade items appear across formats.

Format shift

Online stresses discussions and two major essays; in-person stresses few high-stakes items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Three harsh HIST102 reviews slam boring long lectures and ; one HIST101 review calls it easy A story time.

Main concern

HIST102 , and grades suffer without support.

What students said

“Unless he changes, stay away!”
HIST102
“Easy A, and final) and some joke 500 word essays.”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review found long chapter lectures and but uninspired, with an unused required book.

Main concern

Hour-plus lectures and .

What students said

“His online class consisted of listening to his lectures that were about 1-1 and a half hour long for each chapter. .”
HIST102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes lectures, essays, and tests; one student called HIST101 tests joke online quizzes.

Midterm and finalEssaysDiscussion boardsOnline quizzes (HIST101)

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize long lectures and tough grading; one HIST101 and .

Long boring lecturesTough graderJoke online midterm and final (HIST101)
“Easy A, and final) and some joke 500 word essays.”
HIST101
“He's also a and didn't even bother to give out ”
HIST102

Online

Online HIST102 used long recorded lectures, discussion boards, and .

Long online lecturesDiscussion board heavyTwo major essays
“ . 2 major essays.”
HIST102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless he changes, stay away!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in person), highlighting lecture quality split and grade risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“His lectures are long and boring. He jumps around making it hard to keep up.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ !”

📗 Easy A Outlier

85/100

“Easy A, and final) and some joke 500 word essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are long with no supporting visuals
  • long and boring
  • You basically show up for story time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of
  • Easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Value

  • There is no benefit to going to class at all
  • I knew I was going to get a C
  • Spent money on it for no reason

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews with mixed courses and polar outcomes; HIST102 cluster is consistent but sample remains small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST1024 reviews
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values