AI Rate Professor

Physics

Alix Pouladdej

PHYS101 · PHY101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will show up, put in steady work, and want a supportive physics intro professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardRewards hard workClear lecturesCaring and accessibleLab supportMixed lecture clarity
  • Most students say he rewards honest effort and wants you to succeed.
  • Lectures and and engaging, with one strong dissent on clarity and office hours.
  • and grades lean fair if and past quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is reachable with , and review, but students say you must work for the grade you deserve.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Intro physics concepts stick for many, though labs and applications can feel disconnected and some find the pace harder.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and link .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

and call the course worth the work despite one harsh outlier.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tags and and rewards for effort rather than free grades or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students mention , and group work that need regular review but are not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Five of six reviews call him smart, caring, and very negative clarity review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grade weight often rests on quizzes, midterms, and a and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHYS101 , and fair reward for effort, with one sharp critique of and exam weighting.

Main concern

One review flags unclear English, unfinished examples, no office hours, and .

What students said

“he's a , and his classes were engaging.”
PHYS101
“He's an honest teacher and will reward anyone who is willing to honestly put in the work.”
PHY101
“This professor is difficult to understand. .”
PHYS101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard in-person assessments that , and prior tests.

In-person finalQuizzes and midtermsReview homework and past tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students prepare by attending class and , and ; one review says most of the grade is two midterms and a final.

In-person finalTwo midterms and a finalQuiz and test review
“If you attend every time, and and tests, you will do good on the .”
PHYS101
“Most of the grade is 2 midterms and a final.”
PHYS101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's an honest teacher and will reward anyone who is willing to honestly put in the work. The concepts we learned in this class have stuck with me and left an impression. . Go for it!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2020, highlighting effort-based grading and one clarity outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Very smart teacher who not , but also wants to see you succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ . Go for it!”

⚖️

62/100

“A great professor if you're prepared to work hard to get the grade you deserve.”

⚠️ Clarity Concerns

30/100

“His lectures are unclear, he doesn't explain what is happening, makes lots of mistakes, and doesn't even finish his examples.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's a , and his classes were engaging.
  • His lecture was straight forward.
  • Very smart teacher who helped me

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He will definitely reward anyone who is willing to put in the work
  • and explained well all you have to do is put in some work.
  • Most of the grade is 2 midterms and a final.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is willing to help students.
  • He's an honest teacher and will reward anyone who is willing to honestly put in the work.
  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2016-2020 give a , but the sample is small and one strong negative review reduces certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS1015 reviews
PHY1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values