AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Timothy Ironman

ENGE210 · ENGR245 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid unless and still accept a tough, poorly supported engineering course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachTough graderTest heavyVague paper promptsSelf-study required
  • Students repeatedly say he barely teaches yet and papers.
  • , and test-heavy design dominate recent online and .
  • and stresses hard conceptual reading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Tough grading, vague paper prompts, and and still no guarantee.

Online reviews stress unprepared exams and harsh papers; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Content and assessments demand deep conceptual mastery beyond what lectures or materials provide.

Both online and in-person students describe extreme difficulty and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with no flexibility noted.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Four of five students say no and urge others not to take him, with only one older yes.

; one older in-person review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Repeated tough grader tags and comments about as harsh.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students cite , and heavy reading with little instructional support.

Format shift

Online stresses labs and papers; and reading.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Most reviews say he does not teach, skips lectures or explanation, and leaves students unprepared.

Format shift

Online and one in-person review are scathing; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and high-stakes group research papers.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams and major papers over guided practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one calls him the , while one praises concept-focused hard learning.

Main concern

and students feel unsupported by lazy instruction.

What students said

“The professor is lazy and arrogant. he hardly gives students any knowledge.”
ENGE210
“If you just memorize formulas, you will fail. Be prepared to think hard and .”
ENGR245

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report no real teaching, vague labs and papers, and .

Main concern

He assigns advanced work without instruction and grades harshly for both assuming and not assuming.

What students said

“It is just so .”
ENGR245
“He will not prepare .”
ENGR245
“He has held or office hours.”
ENGE210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as very difficult and unprepared by lectures, with .

Very difficult examsTest heavyConceptual not formula memorizationVague paper prompts

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and formula memorization fails; success needs hard conceptual thinking and reading.

Very difficult examConcept-focused not memorizationTest heavy
“The , and remembering the formula doesn't work at all.”
ENGE210
“If you just memorize formulas, you will fail.”
ENGR245

Online

Online students say he will not prepare you for exams, labs, or papers and .

Test heavyTough graderVague paper promptsUnprepared for exams
“He will not prepare .”
ENGR245
“Prompts for , and you will be severely graded for "assuming", as well as "not assuming".”
ENGR245

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in-person), highlighting non-teaching and harsh assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Collapse

16/100

“he simply does not teach. He has held or office hours.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ ”

📉

16/100

“you will be severely graded for "assuming", as well as "not assuming".”

🔥

28/100

“The , and remembering the formula doesn't work at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It is just so .
  • Professor doesn't teach more than the basic concepts that you would get from a short youtube video
  • He has held or office hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The
  • If you just memorize formulas, you will fail.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support and Papers

  • Prompts for
  • The instructions for .
  • for and expects us to know everything

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent detailed reviews are highly consistent on poor teaching and , though one dissenting positive review and modest sample size keep credibility at medium.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR2453 reviews
ENGE2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2