AI Rate Professor

Drafting

Devon Sowell

DT103 · ENGR103 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Consider him for easy Solidworks skill work and , but be wary of strict classroom control and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent revision feedbackClear grading criteriaEasy contentMandatory attendanceClassroom control concerns
  • One student praises iterative red-mark feedback that lets work become perfect.
  • Course content and as easy with .
  • Another student reports a serious conduct issue of slamming a laptop and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Difficulty ratings are 1 and revision loops let students fix work until perfect, supporting high grades with modest effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Both reviews rate difficulty at 1 and describe Solidworks or drafting work as straightforward class tasks.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and one tag warns that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One enthusiastic yes for after a conduct complaint.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Clear criteria plus repeated fix-and-resubmit feedback make grading student-friendly when work is completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Assignments can be finished in class with free student software and low reported difficulty.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Strong Solidworks teaching and feedback collide with a serious professionalism complaint, leaving a mixed average.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades center on lab or drafting assignments with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and reporting unprofessional classroom enforcement despite good Solidworks teaching.

Main concern

One review alleges laptop slamming and .

What students said

“he red marks the things that are wrong, and then he hands it back to you so you could fix it.”
DT103
“I ended up having the chair notify him that he cannot slam my laptop shut and .”
ENGR103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and , so .

Assignment-based assessmentClear grading criteriaLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; and revision feedback.

Assignment-focusedClear grading criteriaRevision until perfect
“ that are wrong, and then he hands it back to you so you could fix it.”
DT103
“ ”
ENGR103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ that are wrong, and then he hands it back to you so you could fix it. You repeat that until the assignment is perfect.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews on feedback quality versus classroom conduct. Credibility rating: Low.

📝

72/100

“Professor Sowell is an amazing teacher because .”

⚠️ Conduct Concern

20/100

“he cannot slam my laptop shut and .”

📗 Easy Coursework

88/100

“The , but he gives out free student versions as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He did a great job teaching solidworks.
  • .
  • he red marks the things that are wrong

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You repeat that until the .
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • slam my laptop shut and
  • I didn't ever interrupt lecture
  • Not really sure why he decided I deserved that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

and they strongly conflict on professionalism, so confidence in any blended score is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DT1031 review
ENGR1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values