AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Judith Partaine

MATH60 · MATH50 · MATH110 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you already handle math well and and practice exams; otherwise look for another instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkTest Heavy MathPolarizing Teaching ClarityTells Students to DropHelpful If You Seek Her Out
  • MATH sections move fast with and .
  • Some students thrive with practice exams and office help; .
  • Would-take-again is only about 40%, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

, but and dense material make high marks require serious sustained work.

Almost all grade-effort evidence is in person; the single online review still reports weekly tests.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the pace brutal, with chapters stacking and .

; online sample is too small to soften it.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warnings that missing class leaves you lost.

; the one online review also marked attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About 40% would retake her, and and worst-math-teacher warnings.

Polarization .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and practice exams help, but and overall outcomes still feel tough for weaker students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework tags and nightly .

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both the online summer report and most in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Clarity and care are praised by some and called incoherent, rude, or retirement-ready by others, averaging out.

Format shift

evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and as a meaningful but secondary grade booster.

Format shift

; online also reports weekly tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and test-driven, with praise for practice exams and help mixed with complaints about poor explanations and .

Main concern

Multiple students , and classroom tone can feel hostile.

What students said

“every class because its too hard”
MATH110
“She gives you practice exams to take home that cover all the concepts needed to pass the actual exams”
MATH110
“ , and the !”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One accelerated summer online-style and weekly tests, with and late.

Main concern

Accelerated pacing and .

What students said

“there was a lot of . But she was always there in the classroom early and late if you needed any help.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard in-person math tests that many find harder than homework, sometimes with .

Weekly or Frequent TestsPractice ExamsHarder Than HomeworkHomework Effort Points

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students describe challenging tests, sometimes poor instructions, and .

Challenging In-Person TestsPractice ExamsHomework Support
“ but not impossible.”
MATH110
“She gives you practice exams to take home that cover all the concepts needed to pass the actual exams so there arent too many surprises.”
MATH110

Online

The single online review reports a test every week in an accelerated summer course without describing proctoring tools.

Weekly TestsHeavy Homework
“there was a lot of .”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If for whatever reason she does not like you, prepare to be accosted for no apparent reason.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews (1 online, 17 in , and split teaching reputation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

24/100

“LOTS of homework, but she grades on effort which is a .”

🧪 Test-Centered Risk

42/100

“ , and the !”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

48/100

“She's one of the ! .”

👎

40/100

“every class because its too hard”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is horrible at explaining anything so bet on teaching yourself the class
  • Breaks it down to the VERY BASICS
  • she uses alot of powerpoint slides and sometimes is difficult to follow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Put the effort in, and she does everything in her power to help you get a good grade.
  • If math is .
  • yet covered

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • Sweet lady, but didnt know how to lecture very well.
  • she gets sassy with her students.
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews over and , but quality opinions are highly split and the online sample is only one review.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH11012 reviews
MATH604 reviews
MATH502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1