AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Reyes Herminia

PHIL125 · PHIL113 · PHIL101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Reyes Herminia; online philosophy sections show poor teaching, delayed grades, and heavy busywork.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely slow gradingNo personalized feedbackSo many papersTough graderAvoid at all costs
  • Students report multi-week to multi-month grading delays and .
  • and tough grading.
  • Nearly every .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student earned an A but and unreachable, and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Philosophy content plus heavy papers and the subject itself.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and not-mandatory reports.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students and would not take her again, with 0% take-again signal.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

So many papers and way too much work are constant complaints across online sections.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

, and teaching quality as career-endingly bad.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, essays, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are described as the worst college courses students have taken, with , and excessive papers.

Main concern

Assignments sit ungraded for weeks or months and .

What students said

“Takes over 2 months to grade assignments and ”
PHIL113
“ completely the same”
PHIL101
“I have things that I turned in on Jan 30 (it's now March 3) that STILL aren't graded”
125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and , so exam friendliness is unclear.

Paper heavyUnclear essay prompts

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Students emphasize essay-heavy grading and late .

Essay questionsDelayed grading
“ and are full of grammar errors”
PHIL113
“ teacher”
PHIL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“How does this lady still even have a job? this is by far the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 online reviews spanning 2015-2019, , and avoid-level recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“ !!”

🐢

18/100

“Takes over 2 months to grade assignments”

📝 Workload Overload

18/100

“WAY TOO MUCH WORK”

🤖

16/100

“ completely the same”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • I am unsure whether or not an actually person is behind this class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades are not posted quickly at all so you are guessing your grade the entire time

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • WAY TOO MUCH WORK
  • Definitely a class for those who like to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed online reviews from 2015-2019 align on slow grading and poor teaching, but the sample is small and aging.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1251 review
PHIL1011 review
PHIL1131 review
PHIL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values