AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kevin Joiner

MATH215 · MATH205 · MATH56 · MATH60 · MATH135 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid pick for lower-level math if you attend reviews and like lecture-driven classes; expect uneven communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear reviews for testsLecture heavyMixed textbook teachingPatient when it clicksEasy finals after review
  • and easy tests after thorough review.
  • Some , and hard communication.
  • Workload is often light-to-moderate with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, but and mixed grades mean an A still needs steady work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

some courses feel straightforward with good breakdowns, while others feel dense and textbook-heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory and sometimes optional, and he reportedly skips taking it inconsistently.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

60/100

About three in five students would take him again, mainly for clear reviews and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear grading criteria appear often, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

, though some courses still feel heavy for weaker math students.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

; weaker ones criticize verbatim textbook teaching and poor communication.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades and class material.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

several students call him amazing and , while others say he reads the book, grades slowly, and is hard to reach.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching style across courses and .

What students said

“ because he goes through the problems when reviewing for it.”
MATH135
“Joiner made the concepts and methods of solving very easy to understand and straightforward.”
MATH205
“Teaches directly from a textbook, no unique curriculum, which makes the class frustrating and hard to concentrate.”
MATH215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students say review walkthroughs of actual problem types.

Thorough review sessionsTests match homeworkEasy finals reported

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy after thorough review that mirrors test problems.

Thorough review sessionsTests match homeworkEasy finals reported
“ because he goes through the problems when reviewing for it.”
MATH135
“ because of his thorough review.”
MATH60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TAKE IT 100%%%%%%% - Amazing teacher, homework every 2 weeks with only 10 problems, finals super easy after review.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2019, highlighting teaching clarity, exam reviews, and consistency concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

65/100

“Joiner made the concepts and methods of solving very easy to understand and straightforward.”

📝

72/100

“ because he goes through the problems when reviewing for it.”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

35/100

“Doesn't actually teach, teaches verbatim from the book like exact word for word.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher
  • Teaches directly from a textbook, no unique curriculum

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • because he goes through the problems when reviewing
  • but he only checks 10 of the problems

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Gives a homework every 2 weeks with only 10 problems
  • graded

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews span 2016-2019 with mixed but concrete themes; sample is small and somewhat old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1351 review
MATH2051 review
MATH2151 review
MATH561 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1