AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Janina Moretti

CHEM110 · CHEM100LEC · CHEM100 · CHEM103 · CHEM100LAB · CHEM104 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you must take chem with her and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing LecturesTough GraderTest HeavyStutters Through PowerPointsSelf-Teach Required
  • Most students say , and despite her subject knowledge
  • Tough grading, test weight, and
  • A few students survive with , and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and weak lecture support make an A and luck.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Intro chem is taught at a fast advanced pace that many students call overwhelming and foreign even for simple topics.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and comments repeatedly say skip class and you will not pass, with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

About 10 percent would take again and the dominant advice is to switch professors or .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students repeatedly call her a understanding.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, reading, lecture-heavy pace, and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Many say she knows chemistry but , and leaves students confused.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

, and limited drops or replacement options.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chemistry students overwhelmingly call lectures confusing and professors.

Main concern

or self-teaching via STEM center and YouTube.

What students said

“I have never been so as I was with this one.”
CHEM104
“AVOID. nice person, horrible professor.”
CHEM104
“ !!!”
CHEM100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are tough and high-stakes; one review notes half multiple choice and half short answer with heavy lecture dependence.

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe tough, test-heavy exams that require heavy outside study beyond .

Test heavyTough examsHalf multiple choice half short answerExtra credit available sometimes
“ .”
CHEM100
“Such horrible and ”
CHEM110
“our entire class is currently failing”
CHEM104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID. nice person, horrible professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 in-person , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I have never been so as I was with this one.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ !!!”

⚖️

16/100

“Such horrible and ”

📚

25/100

“I've learned more on YouTube than the lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unbearable
  • She stutters and blasts through the PowerPoint
  • her mind is thinking quicker than her mouth can speak

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • We started the semester with 30 and ended with 5; only 2 passed
  • Prepare to read and to study a lot if you want to pass this class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character vs Teaching

  • nice person, horrible professor
  • She seems like she knows what she's talking about I'll give her that
  • She is sweet and wants you to understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty in-person reviews with consistent themes, multiple years, grades, and detailed complaints produce strong confidence.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 513

Course coverage

CHEM1006 reviews
CHEM1046 reviews
CHEM1035 reviews
CHEM100LAB1 review
CHEM100LEC1 review
Show 1 more courses
CHEM1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1