AI Rate Professor

Liberal Studies

Daniella Ashburn

HIST106 · HIST107 · HIST108 · HIS107 · HIST241 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want engaging teaching; only consider if you want an .

Best fit · Easy A HunterReads slidesBoring lecturesOpen-book testsTextbook-dependentMonotonous
  • Most students say she reads PowerPoints nonstop and lectures feel monotonous.
  • cheat sheets, so grades can be easier than lectures suggest.
  • Learning mainly comes from the textbook rather than class teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Open-book quizzes, note sheets, and with textbook work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is not described as conceptually brutal, but volume and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, but many reviews do not stress strict enforcement.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0% and most comments urge students not to enroll.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and resources like cheat sheets or open notes are allowed.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

62/100

, and tests rather than constant heavy projects.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant complaint is nonstop slide reading with little engagement or .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of online quizzes, papers, and written or multiple-choice tests.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and boring, while noting open-book or note-sheet tests that reward textbook study.

Main concern

Almost no teaching value from lectures; and test resources.

What students said

“Lectures are a joke, she just reads word for word off of her slides and doesn't stop until class is over.”
HIS107
“Super easy! . You get a note sheet for your written test in class.”
HIST108
“ but multiple choice and she asks very obscure questions.”
HIST107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as open book or open note with note sheets, so format is student-friendly.

Open bookOpen noteCheat sheet allowedOnline quizzes open book

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews consistently mention open-book or open-note tests and note sheets; no webcam or Lockdown Browser claims.

Open bookOpen noteCheat sheet allowedOnline quizzes open book
“ . You get a note sheet for your written test in class.”
HIST108
“ ”
HIST107
“you are allowed a cheat sheet front and back with no limits”
HIST107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture boredom and open-resource exams. Credibility rating: High.

😴 Lecture Style

24/100

“she just reads word for word off of her slides and doesn't stop until class is over.”

📘

30/100

“I had to do all of .”

📝

84/100

“Super easy! .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • reads word for word off of her slides
  • Very boring and monotonous
  • and dates off of powerpoint slides

Theme 2

📈

  • cheat sheet front and back
  • though

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !!!
  • if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly consistent in-person reviews over several years strongly agree on boring lectures and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST1075 reviews
HIS1072 reviews
HIST1062 reviews
HIST1082 reviews
HIST2411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values