AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Cynthia Perry

PSYCH205 · PSY205 · PSYCHSTATS205 · PSYC205 · SOC205 · PSYH205 · STATISTICS · PSYC205STATS · 104 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
95.45%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

If you need PSY/SOC stats and will do the ; she is one of the strongest and most supported options.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStats whispererGives phone numberHomework mirrors testsCaring but firmShow up and work
  • Students repeatedly say she makes statistics clear, fun, and passable for math-anxious majors.
  • Homework and tests align closely, and , and after-class help.
  • Effort is required and , but the reward is high for students who engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A or B grades, but , and showing up rather than .

Almost all grade evidence is in person; the single online review lacks a reported grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Stats content still challenges math-anxious students, though her teaching makes it far more digestible.

In-person reviews dominate; online comment also frames math struggle as the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews and tags say skip class and you will not pass, with regular participation expected.

Mandatory language is common in person; the one .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

and students call her the best stats professor for psych and soc majors.

Recommendation is strong in person and echoed in the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and sometimes called tough, but and help make grades feel earned and fair.

Format shift

In-person students report fair but ; online detail is limited.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and important, yet many say it is manageable and mirrors the tests.

Format shift

In-person ; online has little workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and relentless help for struggling learners.

Format shift

Excellence is and the one online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and in-class practice all matter, with .

Format shift

In-person assessment detail is rich; online policy is not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Overwhelming praise for , and extra help; a minority find her blunt or hard.

Main concern

, and occasional complaints about attitude or .

What students said

“There is no reason ANYONE would not be able to get and A in her class. !”
PSY205
“ absurd questions, its literally the same as the homework.”
PSYC205STATS
“She even provides her home phone number if you ned to get a hold of her immediately.”
PSYC205STATS

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One online SOC205 , and a strong pick for math strugglers.

Main concern

Only one online review, so format-specific risk is hard to judge.

What students said

“A very caring Professor. . If you struggle with !”
SOC205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

choice and worked problems, not open-book freebies.

Homework-like testsMultiple choice plus work shownFormula sheets mentionedIn-class examsPractice tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and show-your-work problems and closely match homework practice.

Homework-like testsShow workFormula sheetsPractice problems in class
“ and problems that require showing work.”
PSY205
“ absurd questions, its literally the same as the homework.”
PSYC205STATS
“you use formulas sheets for test”
PSYC205

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AMAZING!!! She literally gives you EVERYTHING you need to succeed in her class. There is no reason ANYONE would not be able to get and A in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, mostly in person, highlighting care, clarity, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Quite possibly the .”

👍

94/100

“ !! Take her .... TAKE HER!”

📘

68/100

“its literally the same as the homework.”

❤️ Goes the Extra Mile

90/100

“She even provides her home phone number if you ned to get a hold of her immediately.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just has a way of explaining concepts in the and precise manner possible
  • she makes the lectures really fun and interactive
  • and extra practice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is no reason ANYONE would not be able to get and A in her class.
  • I worked hard for my "A" in her class but would have had a "C" without her extra help.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • A very caring Professor.
  • She even provides her home phone number
  • I've never had a more caring professor!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

104

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years show strong , and high recommend rates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 579
4 out of 513
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYC20512 reviews
PSYCH20512 reviews
PSYC205STATS8 reviews
SOC2058 reviews
PSY2057 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PSYCHSTATS2051 review
PSYH2051 review
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 3

B range

8

B+ 5 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1