George Morgan

CS260 · CSCI112 · CSCI160 · CSCI260 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 36/100
RMP rating: 2.8/5
Take again: 66.67%
Difficulty: 3.6

The decision

Avoid for game design or industry classes unless ; CSCI112 feedback is more mixed-positive.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingBusywork HeavyMandatory AttendanceGame Design GapCaring But Uneven

C programming students can find him paced and supportive, but game-related classes draw strong complaints.
Several reviews say he teaches little and .
and grades can still land as A even when students feel they learned almost nothing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several students still earned As, but others describe heavy busywork and .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is mid-range; the bigger issue is weak instruction rather than advanced theory.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and warns that missing class puts you behind.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

A couple of recent positive takes clash with .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some classes are graded by few things and still yield As, but .

Format shift

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and tedious textbook projects are common complaints.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Supportive in places, but many say lectures teach little useful material for the subject promised.

Format shift

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Homework, research papers, and .

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CS and game-related classes with , and uneven lecture value.

Main concern

Students while completing busywork and .

What students said

“Great teacher. Takes the class at a pace everyone can handle.”
CSCI112

“He teaches nothing and expects you to do the actual learning for the class through research papers”
CSCI160

“Never have I worked so hard to learn so little.”
CSCI 260

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while another reports a .

Open-Book ExamsPop MidtermLecture RehashAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Open-book exams rehashing lectures appear in one course; another mentions a .

Open-Book ExamsPop MidtermLecture Rehash

“ .”
CSCI260

“He gave us a !”
CSCI160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Never have I worked so hard to learn so little. ... Don't waste your time.”
Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching value and busywork. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“He teaches nothing and expects you to do the actual learning for the class through research papers”

📚 Busywork Load

32/100

“this class is nothing more than and tedious paint by number textbook projects”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

70/100

“Great teacher. Takes the class at a pace everyone can handle.”

🎮 Course Fit Concern

35/100

“as a non-gamer he's not the right person to teach this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

and eager to help
and if he does you don't learn anything useful
I can't say i learned a lot but its a necessary class and it was very easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Show up, if you miss a day you can easily fall behind

Theme 3

⚠️ About Learning Value

Never have I worked so hard to learn so little
all I learned about was Atari from the book
covers only basic graphics concepts rather than game logic

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and split clearly between C programming and game courses.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 52

1 out of 51

Course coverage

CS2601 review

CSCI 2601 review

CSCI1121 review

CSCI1601 review

CSCI2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

A 3

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

George Morgan

Avoid for game design or industry classes unless x x x x x; CSCI112 feedback is more mixed-positive.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📚 Busywork Load

👍 Positive Counterpoint

🎮 Course Fit Concern

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Learning Value

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid for game design or industry classes unless ; CSCI112 feedback is more mixed-positive.