AI Rate Professor

Chicano Studies

Maria Lopez-Aramburo

CS101 · CS125 · CSIS101 · CHIC141B · CS100 · HIST141A · CS102 · CHIC141A · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Run from this professor unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandUnorganizedPoor CommunicationSyllabus ChaosAvoid
  • Most students say lectures and , and .
  • , and deadline consistency are frequent failures.
  • A , but the dominant .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some report easy or , but many describe failing gen-ed work or grinding for a C amid chaos.

Online evidence is one harsh review; most .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Material itself is gen-ed level, but poor delivery and shifting expectations make it feel harder than content warrants.

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Participation and when offered in person.

; strongest cues come from in-person tags and lecture-focused comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The review set is dominated by do-not-take warnings about clarity, organization, and communication.

Both the online review and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tags and comments mix tough or , but frustration about fairness is common.

Format shift

Online review calls grading unreasonable; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not the main complaint; chaos around deadlines and .

Format shift

Online students especially report moving due dates and .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Across most reviews she is described as , and unhelpful.

Format shift

Online and and support.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assignments, quizzes, essays, and the syllabus.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and mixed-format comments focus on strong accent barriers, , weak organization, and .

Main concern

Students cannot rely on lectures, syllabus, or timely help to prepare for exams and assignments.

What students said

“ !!!!”
CS101
“She's not helpful at all. Her !”
CS101
“This professor has no idea how to use the online system. .”
CS125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports unclear instruction, ignored syllabus or deadlines, and .

Main concern

Online structure and and unfair for a subject the student otherwise liked.

What students said

“ and does not follow syllabus or assignment deadlines. .”
CS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students say exams and materials, with little proctoring detail.

Exam Content MismatchLecture-Based OutlineUnclear Quiz SourcesMultiple Choice Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and hybrid-style comments say exams may outline lectures or diverge from the book, with .

Exam Content MismatchLecture Outline EmphasisMidterm Not From Book
“She basically outlines everything that .”
CS100
“the with the book.”
CS101
“Her !”
CS101

Online

The sole online review does not clearly document proctoring tools; and .

Unclear DeadlinesUnreasonable Grading
“ and does not follow syllabus or assignment deadlines. .”
CS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (1 online, 21 in person), highlighting clarity, organization, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ !”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

🗣️ Communication Barrier

20/100

“She is very difficult to understand.”

💻 Online Chaos

15/100

“ and does not follow syllabus or assignment deadlines. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't speak clearly

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • if

Theme 3

📈

  • the with the book
  • Worked my **s off in the class for a C

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years are highly consistent on communication and organization failures, with only a few positive outliers.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 59
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CS10113 reviews
CS1003 reviews
CHIC141A1 review
CHIC141B1 review
CS1021 review
Show 3 more courses
CS1251 review
CSIS1011 review
HIST141A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values