AI Rate Professor

Health

Sarah Coffin

NUTR165 · HE165 · NUT185 · NUT165 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
21.43%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless and tolerate disorganization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely UnorganizedCanvas DisasterHeavy WorkloadLong Hard ExamsInconsistent Grading
  • Online courses are chaotic with outdated syllabi and broken Canvas setup
  • Heavy mix of discussions papers and 80-90 question exams with
  • A few students still earned As by self-teaching and ignoring the mess

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Content is not brutal and several students got As if they did the work, but and .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Material is basically introductory nutrition, but messy structure and .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some students report while others say it was not required in the online format.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students say because the class is unorganized and poorly managed online.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some As and exist, but and inconsistent.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many discussions papers WileyPlus work and .

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students repeatedly call the and broken Canvas delivery.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grade blends lots of and discussions with several long exams.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online nutrition and health classes feel unorganized with and heavy busywork plus long exams.

Main concern

and little teaching guidance.

What students said

“ ! I REPEAT. ! The most unorganized class I have ever taken”
NUTR165
“ class, especially online”
NUTR165
“Canvas was all over the place with ”
NUT165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

call hard and test-heavy.

Long Online Exams80-90 QuestionsTests Are ToughExtra Credit Available

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online exams run 80-90 questions and .

Long Online Exams80-90 QuestionsTests Are Tough
“4 exams (80-90) questions long, HARD”
NUTR165
“The exams are difficult, they were all 80-90 questions so make sure you have notes ready”
NUT165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! I REPEAT. ! The most unorganized class I have ever taken, did not guide or teach us in any way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 Online reviews, highlighting disorganization workload and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Organization Crisis

20/100

“ . Canvas was all over the place with ”

📚 Heavy Busywork

28/100

“There are 12 discussions. 4 exams (80-90) questions long, HARD”

⚠️

22/100

“ . ”

🛠️

55/100

“This class you mostly learn independently and have to be motivated to do things yourself”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • The
  • and inundated with past classes
  • Dates for

Theme 2

📝 About Workload and Exams

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK, SO
  • exams are difficult, they were all 80-90 questions
  • Completing the . The

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • You will get an A if you do the work and tests
  • A bunch of but will not be graded so dont even bother
  • SO wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed Online reviews from 2016-2018 are consistent about disorganization though the sample is older and single-format.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

NUT1655 reviews
NUTR1655 reviews
HE1653 reviews
NUT1851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2