AI Rate Professor

EMT & Paramedic

Sarah De Simone

EME106 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

evidence is thin and split, so verify with recent students before enrolling.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized reviewsStudy-dependent passMandatory attendanceEMT coursework
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • One student says she should not teach; if you study.
  • Passing is framed as highly dependent on student effort, not easy support alone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Comments stress that you will ; no evidence of easy A grading.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate, but students describe the class as hard and study-heavy.

Only in-person EME106 reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; nothing suggests optional attendance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Reported take-again is 0 percent, one scathing review, and the positive review still warns the class is hard.

Both reviews are in person and conflict on quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

No strong lenient or ; outcomes seem driven by student study time.

Format shift

In-person only; sparse grade detail.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews imply serious study .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One review praises helpful teaching; another says she should not be a professor, averaging to uneven quality.

Format shift

All comments are in person and contradictory.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

In-person only; limited assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person EME106 feedback is split between a harsh personal critique and praise for helpful teaching if students put in the work.

Main concern

Very small sample with contradictory quality ratings and .

What students said

“should not be a professor. needs to get her act together”
EME106
“She was a very good teacher and extremely helpfull, the class is hard but passing depends on how much time you study”
EME106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam style details for EME106.

“the class is hard but passing depends on how much time you study, she can only help you so much if you dont do your part you wont pass this class”
EME106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was a very good teacher and extremely helpfull, the class is hard but passing depends on how much time you study”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with conflicting tone. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarized Quality

42/100

“should not be a professor. needs to get her act together”

📖 Effort Required

35/100

“passing depends on how much time you study, she can only help you so much if you dont do your part you wont pass this class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • should not be a professor. needs to get her act together
  • She was a very good teacher and extremely helpfull

Theme 2

📈 About Passing the Class

  • the class is hard but passing depends on how much time you study
  • if you dont do your part you wont pass this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old, conflicting reviews with little grade or assessment detail make conclusions fragile.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EME1062 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values