AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mai Thai

MATH60 · MATH100 · MATH110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Only take lower-level sections if ; unless you can self-teach.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing by CourseTough GraderHeavy HomeworkClear Criteria on Easy SectionsLecture-Test Mismatch
  • MATH60 students praise clear criteria and
  • and self-teaching
  • and skipping risks failing

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

MATH60 can yield an A with , but higher courses report failing despite strong past records.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content pace and mismatch between lecture and tests make the course intellectually hard for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Half the students would retake for supportive MATH60 sections; half urge others to stay away from higher courses.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and an F from a previously straight-A student signal harsh standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework is a repeated complaint, especially outside MATH60.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and caring; others say she rushes, ignores questions, and leaves students to the book.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework drives test readiness in positive reviews, while .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

MATH60 feels fair and homework-driven, while MATH100 and MATH110 feel rushed with and .

Main concern

Higher courses may require teaching yourself from the book with .

What students said

“If you do the hw the .”
MATH60
“You often have to teach yourself from the book.. Problems that were not gone over in lecture or .”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; higher courses report surprise problems not covered in class.

Homework-Based TestsNo Tricks (Lower Courses)Uncovered Problems on Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

MATH60, but higher courses report problems not covered in lecture or homework.

Homework-Based TestsNo TricksUncovered Test Problems
“ and the material, no tricks.”
MATH60
“Problems that were not gone over in lecture or .”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Please listen to me. I looked at reviews and thought I would be fine, but I'm failing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting course-level splits in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarizing Outcomes

48/100

“Professor Thai teaches the topic and emphasizes the , so .”

📚

30/100

“You often have to teach yourself from the book.”

📝

55/100

“If you do the hw the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is always willing to help students to understand during class and .
  • She rushes and .
  • She is very lecture heavy, but unfortunately lecture does not always match material on the homework.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the homework and ask questions you will pass.
  • I have never failed a class in my life ... yet I failed her class.
  • Problems that were not gone over in lecture or .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2017-2018 show a clear course-level split but a small dated sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH602 reviews
MATH1001 review
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values