AI Rate Professor

Zoology

Stacey Bae

ZOO200 · BIO101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; only consider if and tolerate weak instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOut of DepthUnclear ExpectationsMumbled LecturesUnprofessionalAvoid for Anatomy
  • Three of four reviews strongly warn against her, especially in ZOO200.
  • Students say she , and .
  • One BIO101 review is positive, so experience may vary by course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Negative reviews say it is hard to pass with a and expectations.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students report high difficulty and little useful instruction, making the material feel harder than it should.

All four reviews are in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and not mandatory in others, with no consistent policy story.

, and they disagree.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most detailed reviews say do not take her, despite one short positive BIO101 note.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students warn they cannot get a decent grade and report chaotic exam scheduling.

Format shift

All grading comments are from in-person ZOO200 reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reviews focus more on weak teaching than assignment volume, with some notes of few tests and in BIO101.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; workload detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say , and cannot answer course questions.

Format shift

One BIO101 student enjoyed her; ZOO200 reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Comments center on exams that started late, were combined, and felt poorly managed.

Format shift

Exam issues appear in in-person ZOO200 reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

little subject knowledge, mumbled lectures, late or combined exams, and .

Main concern

Students feel they learn almost nothing and grades are hard to protect.

What students said

“Unprofessional, unskilled, has little academic knowledge.”
ZOO200
“So far I have learned nothing from her class. Waste of time.”
ZOO200
“Great person. Enjoyed”
BIO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and combined tests, with little detail on proctoring style.

Exams LateCombined ExamsFew TestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students report delayed starts, combined exams, and .

Started Exams LateCombined Two ExamsUnclear Exam Expectations
“Started 2 exams late. Combined 2 exams in 1.”
ZOO200
“ .”
ZOO200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Unprofessional, unskilled, has little academic knowledge.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting weak instruction and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Awful teacher. Mumbles her lectures, does not even know a thing”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“If you want to pass this course and get a .”

📚 Subject Mastery

15/100

“she majored in biology in college and straight up told her students that anatomy is completely new and foreign to her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads off of the .
  • Mumbles her lectures
  • Great person. Enjoyed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • Out of her depth as a educator.
  • Waste of time. .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • Didn't show up to class & it was cancelled by the Dept.
  • Started 2 exams late.
  • Unprofessional, unskilled

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with mixed course contexts and limited grade detail reduce confidence despite strong negative consistency in ZOO200.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ZOO2003 reviews
BIO1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1