AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Susan Tarmas

ESL14 · ESL55 · 50LEC30051 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want useful ESL instruction and are willing to work for a fair grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderCaringGives good feedbackRespectedHelpful lectures
  • Most students call her nice, caring, and well prepared for quizzes and exams.
  • As when students complete all assignments and essays carefully.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is reachable if and essays carefully, but and some grade disputes keep it from being easy.

; the online review only notes tough grading and a B.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

ESL content is useful and assignments are not described as extremely hard, but and .

Online review flags more reading; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Three of four students would take her again and .

Online and ; one older in-person review strongly does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

, and one student reported a paragraph score being cut from 89 to 79.

Format shift

; grade dispute is from an in-person ESL55 review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, essays, midterm, and final, but not always overwhelming.

Format shift

; online student stresses heavy reading.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students say , and .

Format shift

Strong praise in both formats, with one sharp in-person dissent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and final.

Format shift

Exam prep detail comes mainly from in-person ESL55; online review is light on assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is mostly seen as nice, respectful, and .

Main concern

One student felt grades were unfairly lowered on paragraphs.

What students said

“If and work on an .”
ESL55
“ ! I like her classes very much.”
ESL14
“I don't like this teacher at all.”
ESL55

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One student found , and reading-heavy.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I'm glad to have this teacher. An strict professor but flexible person.”
50LEC30051

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final without open-book or proctoring details.

In-class quizzesMidterm examFinal exam

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and final that she prepares well for.

In-class quizzesMidterm examFinal exam
“she prepares for a , and the .”
ESL55

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If and work on an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in , and recommendation mix. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is a very nice professor. Her lecture is useful, and she prepares for a , and the .”

⚖️

38/100

“When I saw my paragraph I got 89% and she cross my real percent score and now I got 79%.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • !
  • She really tries to help all her students.
  • An strict professor but flexible person.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Sometimes she gives us a lot of homework but not always.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture is useful
  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four detailed 2017 reviews with mixed grades and , but one strong outlier lowers certainty.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL552 reviews
50LEC300511 review
ESL141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values