AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Thowsen

ENG10 · ENG10LEC73251 · ENG50 · ENG100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you must and are ready for heavy typing, many draft copies, and strict expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkTough graderContradictory rulesDiscussion heavyPaper waste
  • , and pop quizzes.
  • Students split and and contradictory.
  • Textbook is essential and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and reports of finals failing after praised rough drafts make an A hard-earned.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard English composition, but volume of homework and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and she pushes active class discussion participation.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

; some call her great and clear while .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, and claims that loved rough drafts can still fail as .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of per essay, pop quizzes, and required textbook.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and care; others cite contradictions, insensitivity, and poor organization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment is driven by essays, multi-copy , and pop quizzes more than big exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English students report energetic discussion-heavy classes with and polarized views on fairness.

Main concern

Contradictory instructions, harsh or , and massive printing or typing demands.

What students said

“ . She gives more information outside of the book.”
ENG10
“ ! Her class was so disappointing that I didn't even want to show up”
ENG50
“You will waste so much paper and ink in her class.”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize pop quizzes and multi-draft essays .

Pop quizzesMultiple essay draftsPeer edit sessions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews highlight pop quizzes and multi-draft .

Pop quizzesMulti-draft essaysPeer editing
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
ENG10
“She demands 3 or 4 copies of a rough draft essay, (2 )”
ENG50
“She will love your rough drafts, and .”
ENG50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will love your rough drafts, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, , and mixed recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“You will waste so much paper and ink in her class.”

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“ . She gives more information outside of the book. Helps you out in essays and paragraphs.”

⚠️

30/100

“ ! Her class was so disappointing that I didn't even want to show up, but it was too late to withdraw.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Strict on EVERYTHING!!!
  • She will love your rough drafts, and .

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Stock up on ink and paper
  • make sure you do all the homework and bring it every day

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very enbergetic and interacting
  • She LOVES class discussion
  • She contradicts herself far too often

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several and split teaching quality, giving medium-high confidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG507 reviews
ENG102 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG10LEC732511 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1