AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Michelle Dexter

PSYC125 · PSYCH105 · SOC105 · PSYC105 · PSYCH120 · PSYCSOC · PSYC120 · PSYC100 · PSYCH102 · PSYC · PSYCH101 · PSYCH110 · SOC125 · PSY100 · PHYC125 · PYSCH100 · PSYC101 · PSYCH125 · PSY105 · PSYCH100 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if , and study; skip if you want a low-drama easy elective.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing personalityTest and lecture heavyOpinionated discussionsShow-up and study for ACurve on exams
  • Many students call her passionate, funny, and if you attend and use study guides.
  • A sizable minority find lectures boring, biased, intimidating, or unfair with tricky tests.
  • Expect , and a sizable project in many sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many say an A is realistic with , and worksheets, but trick questions and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Average difficulty is moderate-low; content is often called interesting and doable if you show up and study.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation matter and skipping risks your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half the ; fans love her passion while critics reject bias and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Curves and easy A reports exist, but .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly readings or prompts, a few exams, and a .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority praise knowledge and discussion energy, while a minority report boring, intimidating, or unprepared lectures.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and weekly work; tags frequently say test heavy.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person psych and sociology sections are conversational and content-rich for many, but polarizing on personality, bias, lecture pace, and .

Main concern

, and tricky or poorly written tests frustrate a vocal minority.

What students said

“THE ! .”
SOC105
“Her class/lecture is boring AF and . .”
PSYC120
“WONDERFUL TEACHER,YOU CAN EASYLY GET AN A IF YOU DO THE WORKSHEETS AND SHOW UP TO CLASS”
PSYCH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Typically a and curves; difficulty and fairness comments conflict.

Multiple choice testsStudy guidesExam curvesTrick questionsTerm project

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections usually use multi-choice , and a major project; some report trick questions.

Multiple choice testsStudy guidesExam curvesTrick questions
“3 m/c tests, weekly DBQ, 1 field trip essay to an .”
PSYC125
“there were still 5-6 trick questions per test. .”
PSYC125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“as long as you , and use the online study guide, you can easily get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 in-person psychology and sociology reviews with high sample size and mixed sentiment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

72/100

“ , and EXTREMELY educated!”

👎 Recommendation Divide

48/100

“ .”

📝

52/100

“there were still 5-6 trick questions per test. .”

📅

22/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were super long and sometimes dreadful
  • Her lectures seem more like a mini therapy session

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A if you do the worksheets and show up

Theme 3

⚡ About Personality

  • Intimidating/opinonated
  • very passionate about what she teaches
  • imposes her extreme liberal/ hippie views

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

49 in-person reviews across many years with rich detail and mixed but patterned opinions support high credibility.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 510
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYCH1008 reviews
PSYC1005 reviews
PSY1054 reviews
PSYC1204 reviews
PSYCH1054 reviews
Show 16 more courses
PSYCH1254 reviews
SOC1053 reviews
PSY1002 reviews
PSYC1252 reviews
PSYCH1202 reviews
1051 review
PHYC1251 review
PSYC1 review
PSYC1011 review
PSYC1051 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYCH1021 review
PSYCH1101 review
PSYCSOC1 review
PYSCH1001 review
SOC1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 2 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values