AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kim Saenal

MATH56 · KIM48838 · MATH160STATS · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Run away unless you already know the material and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderConfusing LecturesPop QuizzesLots of CrammingAvoid
  • Students report with frequent mistakes and
  • and heavy cramming pressure
  • Zero positive quality ratings across the sample

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and cramming with little clarity make an A extremely hard.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students describe constant cramming, maximum difficulty, and lectures that add confusion instead of help.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every reviewer gave quality 1 and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tagged as a and no student-reported grade relief.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and pop-quiz pressure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she stumbles, confuses the subject, makes lecture mistakes, and arrives late.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and high-pressure with and pop quizzes.

Main concern

Unclear lectures, software distrust conflicts, and .

What students said

“I had trouble learning for her lots of cramming. I didn't like how she taught”
KIM48838
“she stumbles over ”
MATH160STATS
“Makes lots of mistakes during lecture. Late to class a lot.”
MATH56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes and clarity.

Pop QuizzesTough GraderMyMathLab Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Beware of pop quizzes and ; .

Pop QuizzesTough GraderMyMathLab Homework
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
KIM48838
“all the chapter, so it's hard to know when to start stop for a single section”
MATH56

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would have given her all zeros. She is a very pretty woman. That being said she stumbles over ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting and harsh difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“lots of cramming into class, without much clarity. Makes lots of mistakes during lecture.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“I LOVE MATH BUT NOT THIS CLASS”

⚠️

15/100

“ ”

📌 Attendance and Quizzes

12/100

“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I needed problems done on the bored step by step, and to clarification.
  • she stumbles over
  • Makes lots of mistakes during lecture. Late to class a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • I had trouble learning for her lots of cramming.
  • lots of cramming into class, without much clarity.
  • all the chapter

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Trust

  • I told her I didn't trust the software and she told me I was lying
  • I felt like I was in high school, but without open office hours.
  • She did not preform to my standards.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three unanimously negative reviews, but they are detailed and consistent on teaching and difficulty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

KIM488381 review
MATH160STATS1 review
MATH561 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2