AI Rate Professor

Cabinet & Furniture Technology

Jerry Beaudry

CFT169 · CFT161 · CFT105 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid by default; only consider if software intro.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Study RequiredCondescending AttitudeSparse DemosSketchUp StrengthAvoid If Possible
  • Most and TAs rather than him.
  • One SketchUp intro section earned strong praise for demos and practice advice.
  • unless the specific course structure fits you.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty is low to moderate, but .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content difficulty is generally low, with intro software work and limited lecture intensity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At ; others do not describe flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Explicit avoid language outweighs one positive SketchUp follow-up interest.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; complaints focus more on instruction quality than grade harshness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

65/100

Reasonable projects and light demonstration-based work appear in comments; not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Two of three reviews slam sparse demos and condescension; one SketchUp class is clearly better.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Projects and practice-oriented coursework dominate; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

intro to sections with almost no demos and condescending guidance.

Main concern

Poor instruction quality outside of one well-received software course.

What students said

“Very little quality guidance from this instructor. Mostly condescending attitude.”
CFT105
“Lots of video demonstrations. Led us through steps. Great advice on how to practice.”
CFT169
“Only 2 demonstrations the entire semester. 3 lectures just reviewing the handouts.”
CFT161

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and demos rather than formal exams, with .

Project-BasedVideo DemonstrationsHandout Review

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and demonstrations rather than formal exams; .

Project-BasedVideo Demonstrations
“ .”
CFT169
“Only 2 demonstrations the entire semester. 3 lectures just reviewing the handouts.”
CFT161

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If I see his name as if I've signed up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person CFT reviews with mixed course outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Very little quality guidance from this instructor. Mostly condescending attitude.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ .”

🛠️

40/100

“What was learned in his class was largely through self study and quality TAs”

💻 SketchUp Bright Spot

70/100

“Lots of video demonstrations. Led us through steps. Great advice on how to practice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mostly condescending attitude.
  • Only 2 demonstrations the entire semester.
  • Lots of video demonstrations. Led us through steps.

Theme 2

📈 About Learning Outcomes

  • What was learned in his class was largely through self study and quality TAs
  • Your time and money would be better spent on library books and a lab class.
  • .

Theme 3

🚫 About Taking Him Again

  • .
  • .
  • if I've signed up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across different CFT courses and years, with mixed outcomes, so confidence stays low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CFT1051 review
CFT1611 review
CFT1691 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values