AI Rate Professor

Economics, History, Poli. Sci.

Radu Munteanu

ECO602 · ECON100 · ECON101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy AccentBook DependentTough GraderLong LecturesHard to Follow
  • Most students struggle to understand his accent and off-topic lectures.
  • He leans hard on the textbook instead of clear in-class explanation.
  • , but many still find the class stressful and hard to pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Curves and open-book tests help some students, but and weak lectures still make an A uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

High difficulty ratings and , and poorly aligned tests make content feel hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping can tank the grade or participation.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students advise choosing another Econ professor because and stressful.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and grade penalties for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and not always heavy, but review volume and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students repeatedly cite heavy accent, off-topic lectures, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and , and lecture content often fails to match exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Econ reviews cluster around hard-to-follow lectures, textbook dependence, and .

Main concern

Accent and lecture quality make learning in class unreliable.

What students said

“He depends on the book and reads it straight from there with ”
ECON101
“If , I'd recommend not taking him.”
ECON101
“ for every test”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several students report open-book tests and curves, though finals can still be tough and misaligned with lectures.

Open Book TestsCurvesTough Finals

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

many quizzes or exams, plus a tougher final.

Open Book TestsCurvesTough Final
“ for every test and tests were not that hard if you studied.”
ECON101
“The , but .”
ECON101
“ test in class.”
ECO602

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If , I'd recommend not taking him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews with strong consistency on lecture clarity and textbook reliance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“he is a dedicated teacher who wanted you to pass but has a very heavy accent that makes him very hard to understand.”

📚 Book Dependence

25/100

“be prepared to live out of your textbook.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“Choose another professor.”

📝

68/100

“lets you use the book for every test and if you studied.”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Clarity & Accent

  • Very hard to understand, has thick accent
  • has a very heavy accent that makes him very hard to understand
  • pronounces relatively simple words incorrectly

Theme 2

📖 About Teaching Method

  • reads it straight from there with
  • his reliance on the book rather than actually teaching is too high
  • Lectures are very long, he jumps around too much

Theme 3

📈

  • for every test
  • test in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed in-person reviews from 2013-2017 are highly consistent about accent, textbook reliance, and weak lecture quality.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECON1019 reviews
ECO6021 review
ECON1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1