AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Francisco Villa

PHSC100 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and broken tech.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear EnglishCanvas problemsLecture heavyWould not take againHard to follow
  • Students struggle because .
  • Assignments on Canvas frequently failed for students.
  • Would-not-take-again and a C grade signal a poor experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A reported C plus communication barriers make an A difficult even at moderate difficulty.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Rated difficulty 3, but the number suggests.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Student would not and broken Canvas work.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Student earned a C with no signs of .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Assignments lived on Canvas but volume is not described beyond platform failures.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Quality rating of 1 and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

style.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One and unreliable Canvas assignments.

Main concern

Communication barriers and .

What students said

“He doesn't speak clear English, and most of " which barely ever worked on my computer as well as other students.”
PHSC100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't speak clear English, and most of " which barely ever worked on my computer as well as other students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting communication and tech issues. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ ”

💻 Platform Problems

20/100

“most of " which barely ever worked”

👎

8/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • LECTURE HEAVY

Theme 2

💻 About Course Tools

  • " which barely ever worked
  • as well as other students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single negative 2016 review with one C grade and no counter-reviews.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHSC1001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values