AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Alberto Vigil

ANTH101 · ANTH100 · HIST102 · ANTH105 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can self-study; skip him if and strong teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterInconsistentEasy A OptionOff-Topic LecturesHelpful If AskedMixed Grading
  • Many call the class easy and even a no-brainer A, but learning quality is debated
  • Helpful one-on-one, yet
  • Exam and and hard-grader complaints

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students call it an easy or no-brainer A, though .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often easy if you read and self-study, but lectures can confuse rather than clarify.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

; another says required for .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Helpful and easy for .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Often described as easy or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Notes, a , and projects; not usually overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Knows the subject and can help, but many find him unclear, inconsistent, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of labs, quizzes, tests, papers, and note-based study rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and helpful praise versus inconsistency, weak lectures, and .

Main concern

, and lectures that may not teach the material well.

What students said

“Take this professor if you want an easy easy A in Anthro but if you actually want to learn about anthropology this is not the class for you.”
ANTH100
“Very inconsistent and unclear. Never gave us any clear guidelines on what he wanted for any assignments.”
ANTH101
“He is an awesome Professor. He if you have any questions.”
ANTH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

note card allowed, and difficulty is usually moderate.

Book Based Exams3x5 Note CardModerate DifficultyQuizzes And Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

card, quizzes, and a few tests.

Book Based Exams3x5 Note CardFew QuizzesThree Tests
“ and you get to have a 3x5 note card.”
ANTH101
“His exams are of moderate difficulty, but he and papers.”
HIST102
“its all based on notes a few quizes and 3 test and tells you what to study for on the test”
ANTH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take this professor if you want an easy easy A in Anthro but if you actually want to learn about anthropology this is not the class for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, balancing easy-grade praise against inconsistency and learning concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Tradeoff

76/100

“his class IS easy and is an no brainer A if you can get through spending 4 hours a week with him.”

📉 Clarity Issues

35/100

“Very inconsistent and unclear. Never gave us any clear guidelines on what he wanted for any assignments.”

🤝 Helpfulness

70/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy easy A in Anthro
  • I hear he's an
  • he is a .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are long and most of the time they stray away from the topic
  • He can be difficult to understand

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Hes a and very respectful
  • super helpful if you have any questions
  • He's not afraid to call you out in class if you're not paying attention.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mixed in-person reviews from 2010-2016 give decent coverage but conflicting views on teaching and grading.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1015 reviews
ANTH1002 reviews
ANTH1051 review
HIST1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values